JMUB vs. SCMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JMUB (JPMorgan Municipal ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. JMUB is actively managed, while SCMB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JMUB returned 3.91%/yr vs 3.37%/yr for SCMB. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMUB charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.

Performance

JMUB vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMUB achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.07% return.

JMUB

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: 1.53%
• 1Y: 6.12%
• 3Y*: 3.91%
• 5Y*: 1.23%
• 10Y*: —

SCMB

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.07%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 6.86%
• 3Y*: 3.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMUB vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JMUB JPMorgan Municipal ETF	1.26%	4.34%	1.88%	5.96%	2.82%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	1.07%	3.78%	0.91%	5.86%	3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JMUB and SCMB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022	0.87

The correlation between JMUB and SCMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

JMUB vs. SCMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JMUB	SCMB
Communication Services	8.6%	0.5%
Financial Services	2.2%	8.9%
Utilities	2.2%	0.2%
Technology	1.0%	0.9%
Real Estate	0.9%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	0.6%	2.6%
Basic Materials	0.4%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	0.1%
Industrials	0.2%	0.2%
Healthcare	0.1%	0.1%
Energy	0.0%	0.0%

Return for Risk

JMUB vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMUB

JMUB Risk / Return Rank: 69
JMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
JMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
JMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
JMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 49

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 64
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMUB vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JMUB	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.34	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	3.45	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.50	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	2.36	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.37	7.89	+0.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JMUB vs. SCMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMUB Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the SCMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMUB and SCMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JMUB	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	2.34	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.97	-0.24

Drawdowns

JMUB vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMUB drawdown since its inception was -12.50%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMUB and SCMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMUB	SCMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.50%	-6.13%	-6.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.55%	-2.92%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.79%	-5.57%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.87%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-1.32%	-1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	0.87%	-0.14%

Volatility

JMUB vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) is 0.86%, while Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that JMUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMUB	SCMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.86%	1.04%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.83%	2.17%	-0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40%	2.94%	-0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	4.16%	-0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.14%	4.16%	-0.02%

JMUB vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMUB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JMUB vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

JMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than SCMB's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JMUB JPMorgan Municipal ETF	3.60%	3.52%	3.50%	3.20%	2.16%	1.94%	2.13%	3.66%	0.45%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.54%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMUB and SCMB in my portfolio?

JMUB and SCMB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMUB or SCMB?

SCMB has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to JMUB (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMUB dropped -12.50% vs SCMB's -6.13%.

Which ETF is better, JMUB or SCMB?

On 3-year performance, JMUB leads with 3.91% vs 3.37% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JMUB or SCMB?

Over the 3-year period, JMUB has performed better with a 3.91% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMUB or SCMB?

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JMUB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMUB or SCMB?

JMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 3.54% for SCMB.

What is the main difference between JMUB and SCMB?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMUB and 0.03% for SCMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.