JMUB vs. JPLD

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

JMUB (JPMorgan Municipal ETF) and JPLD (JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMUB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JPLD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JMUB returned 5.69% vs 4.11% for JPLD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JMUB charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for JPLD.

Performance

JMUB vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) and JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMUB achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly higher than JPLD's 1.23% return.

JMUB

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 1.02%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: 3.68%
• 5Y*: 1.10%
• 10Y*: —

JPLD

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.03%
• 6M: 1.21%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 1Y: 4.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMUB vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JMUB JPMorgan Municipal ETF	1.51%	4.34%	1.88%	3.16%
JPLD JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF	1.23%	6.01%	6.49%	3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between JMUB and JPLD is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023	0.55

The correlation between JMUB and JPLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JMUB vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMUB

JMUB Risk / Return Rank: 77
JMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
JMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
JMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 93
JMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
JMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 57

JPLD

JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 93
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMUB vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) and JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMUB	JPLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.78	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	4.25	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.57	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	4.11	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.79	18.82	-11.04

JMUB vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMUB Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMUB and JPLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JMUB vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMUB drawdown since its inception was -12.50%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMUB and JPLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMUB	JPLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.50%	-1.17%	-11.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.55%	-1.00%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-0.24%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-0.15%	-2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	0.22%	+0.51%

Volatility

JMUB vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) and JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) have volatilities of 0.57% and 0.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMUB	JPLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.57%	0.56%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.90%	1.09%	+0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41%	1.49%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	1.83%	+1.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.12%	1.83%	+2.29%

JMUB vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMUB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JMUB vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

JMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than JPLD's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JMUB JPMorgan Municipal ETF	3.61%	3.52%	3.50%	3.20%	2.16%	1.94%	2.13%	3.66%	0.45%
JPLD JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF	4.28%	4.24%	4.47%	1.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMUB and JPLD in my portfolio?

JMUB and JPLD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMUB or JPLD?

JMUB has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to JPLD (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMUB dropped -12.50% vs JPLD's -1.17%.

Which ETF is better, JMUB or JPLD?

On 1-year performance, JMUB leads with 5.69% vs 4.11% for JPLD. On fees, JMUB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JMUB or JPLD?

Over the 1-year period, JMUB has performed better with a 5.69% return vs 4.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMUB or JPLD?

JMUB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMUB or JPLD?

JPLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 3.61% for JMUB.

What is the main difference between JMUB and JPLD?

JMUB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while JPLD is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMUB and 0.24% for JPLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.