JMUB vs. IBMM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JMUB (JPMorgan Municipal ETF) and IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. JMUB is actively managed, while IBMM is passively managed. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

JMUB vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JMUB

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 6.09%
• 3Y*: 3.88%
• 5Y*: 1.26%
• 10Y*: —

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMUB vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
JMUB JPMorgan Municipal ETF	0.49%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

JMUB vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMUB

JMUB Risk / Return Rank: 70
JMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
JMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
JMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
JMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMUB vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JMUB	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.33	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JMUB	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	—	—

Drawdowns

JMUB vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMUB drawdown since its inception was -12.50%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMUB and IBMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMUB	IBMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.50%	0.00%	-12.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	0.00%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	0.00%	-2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JMUB	IBMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.87%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40%	0.00%	+2.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	0.00%	+3.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.14%	0.00%	+4.14%

JMUB vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JMUB and IBMM have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JMUB vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

JMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JMUB JPMorgan Municipal ETF	3.59%	3.52%	3.50%	3.20%	2.16%	1.94%	2.13%	3.66%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, JMUB or IBMM?

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMUB or IBMM?

JMUB and IBMM have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMUB or IBMM?

JMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

What is the main difference between JMUB and IBMM?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares.