PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMUB vs. FMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMUB vs. FMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMUB achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than FMUN's 1.63% return.


JMUB

1D
0.16%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.66%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*

FMUN

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.63%
6M
2.20%
1Y
7.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMUB vs. FMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JMUB and FMUN is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025

0.76

The correlation between JMUB and FMUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMUB vs. FMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMUB
JMUB Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FMUN
FMUN Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMUB vs. FMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMUBFMUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.50

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.27

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

7.49

+0.84

JMUB vs. FMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMUB Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the FMUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMUB and FMUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMUBFMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.34

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.27

-0.53

Drawdowns

JMUB vs. FMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMUB drawdown since its inception was -12.50%, which is greater than FMUN's maximum drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMUB and FMUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMUBFMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.50%

-3.21%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-3.21%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.72%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-0.82%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.97%

-0.24%

Volatility

JMUB vs. FMUN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) is 0.87%, while Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that JMUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMUBFMUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

1.27%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.83%

2.27%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40%

3.12%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.33%

4.06%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

4.06%

+0.08%

JMUB vs. FMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMUB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUN's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMUB vs. FMUN - Dividend Comparison

JMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than FMUN's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FMUN
Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF
3.29%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
3.59%3.52%3.50%3.20%2.16%1.94%2.13%3.66%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMUB and FMUN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMUN has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to JMUB (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMUB dropped -12.50% vs FMUN's -3.21%.

On 1-year performance, FMUN leads with 7.24% vs 6.09% for JMUB. On fees, FMUN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, JMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMUN has performed better with a 7.24% return vs 6.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMUN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JMUB.

JMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 3.29% for FMUN.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMUB and 0.05% for FMUN.

JMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMUB and FMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer