PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMST vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMST vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMST achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 86.77% return.


JMST

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.04%
6M
0.84%
YTD
1.22%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
3.28%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.13%

USO

1D
1.33%
1M
24.23%
6M
62.44%
YTD
86.77%
1Y
66.76%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
20.59%
10Y*
5.64%
ALL TIME*
-6.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.89M$60.71M$58.68M
$968.42M$871.56M$931.57M

JMST vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JMST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF
1.22%3.35%3.31%3.56%0.07%0.31%2.00%2.09%0.70%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
86.77%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between JMST and USO is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

-0.05

The correlation between JMST and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMST vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JMST
JMST Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
JMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMST Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
JMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMST Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JMST vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMSTUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.06

1.25

+0.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.82

1.93

+7.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

50.25

5.60

+44.66

JMST vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMST Sharpe Ratio is 4.00, which is higher than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMST and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMST vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMST drawdown since its inception was -2.41%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMST and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSTUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-98.19%

+95.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

-32.49%

+32.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.71%

-32.49%

+31.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.15%

-36.23%

+35.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-86.26%

+86.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-75.38%

+75.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

12.03%

-11.98%

Volatility

JMST vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF (JMST) is 0.21%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that JMST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMSTUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

17.73%

-17.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.44%

42.79%

-42.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63%

46.91%

-46.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.83%

37.06%

-36.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.13%

39.29%

-38.16%

JMST vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMST has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMST vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

JMST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JMST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF
2.40%2.84%3.32%3.09%1.10%0.27%0.87%1.63%0.28%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMST and USO have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (17.73%) compared to JMST (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMST dropped -2.41% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 5-year performance, USO leads with 20.59% vs 2.30% for JMST. On fees, JMST is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JMST has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USO has performed better with a 20.59% return vs 2.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMST is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

JMST has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

JMST is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMST and 0.86% for USO.

JMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMST and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer