PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMSSX vs. JLGMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMSSX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2045 Fund (JMSSX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSSX achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than JLGMX's 7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, JMSSX has underperformed JLGMX with an annualized return of 10.85%, while JLGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.16% annualized return.


JMSSX

1D
0.14%
1M
3.85%
YTD
11.11%
6M
12.18%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
10.85%

JLGMX

1D
0.66%
1M
6.71%
YTD
7.96%
6M
6.63%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
24.07%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
20.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSSX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2045 Fund
11.11%19.37%11.32%21.95%-17.78%16.15%12.91%24.54%-8.59%20.17%
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
7.96%14.38%35.40%34.95%-25.20%18.48%56.39%39.47%0.74%38.41%

Correlation

The correlation between JMSSX and JLGMX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.85

The correlation between JMSSX and JLGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMSSX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSSX
JMSSX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
JMSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

JLGMX
JLGMX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JLGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JLGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSSX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2045 Fund (JMSSX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMSSXJLGMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

1.44

+0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.38

1.98

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.26

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

1.34

+1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.99

3.82

+10.17

JMSSX vs. JLGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the JLGMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSSX and JLGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMSSXJLGMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.44

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.70

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.94

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.85

-0.16

Drawdowns

JMSSX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSSX drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, roughly equal to the maximum JLGMX drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSSX and JLGMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSSXJLGMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-31.82%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-16.73%

+8.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-21.47%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

-31.13%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

-31.82%

-0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-5.81%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

5.85%

-3.93%

Volatility

JMSSX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2045 Fund (JMSSX) is 3.47%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that JMSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMSSXJLGMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.87%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

11.22%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.21%

15.60%

-4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

20.18%

-5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

21.57%

-6.18%

JMSSX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSSX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMSSX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison

JMSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than JLGMX's 10.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
10.23%11.04%2.12%0.31%3.49%14.25%5.14%12.65%15.59%14.44%9.71%4.43%
JMSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2045 Fund
2.04%2.27%2.04%1.94%1.73%3.92%1.20%2.39%5.57%1.91%2.02%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMSSX and JLGMX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLGMX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to JMSSX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSSX dropped -32.68% vs JLGMX's -31.82%.

JMSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMSSX and JLGMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer