JMSSX vs. SEEGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JMSSX (JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2045 Fund) and SEEGX (JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - JMSSX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by JPMorgan, while SEEGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by JPMorgan. Over the past 10 years, JMSSX returned 10.89%/yr vs 19.86%/yr for SEEGX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMSSX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SEEGX.

Performance

JMSSX vs. SEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2045 Fund (JMSSX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSSX achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than SEEGX's 7.85% return. Over the past 10 years, JMSSX has underperformed SEEGX with an annualized return of 10.89%, while SEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.86% annualized return.

JMSSX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 4.80%
• YTD: 11.53%
• 6M: 12.14%
• 1Y: 26.44%
• 3Y*: 18.38%
• 5Y*: 9.20%
• 10Y*: 10.89%

SEEGX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 6.70%
• YTD: 7.85%
• 6M: 6.50%
• 1Y: 21.53%
• 3Y*: 23.78%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: 19.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSSX vs. SEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JMSSX JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2045 Fund	11.53%	19.37%	11.32%	21.95%	-17.78%	16.15%	12.91%	24.54%	-8.59%	20.17%
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund	7.85%	14.08%	35.14%	34.62%	-25.40%	18.17%	56.02%	39.13%	0.50%	38.03%

Correlation

The correlation between JMSSX and SEEGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.85

The correlation between JMSSX and SEEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JMSSX vs. SEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSSX

JMSSX Risk / Return Rank: 66
JMSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
JMSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
JMSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
JMSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
JMSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

SEEGX

SEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
SEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
SEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
SEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
SEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSSX vs. SEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2045 Fund (JMSSX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JMSSX	SEEGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.42	+0.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	1.96	+1.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.25	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	1.31	+1.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.98	3.74	+10.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JMSSX vs. SEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the SEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSSX and SEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JMSSX	SEEGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	1.42	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.68	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.92	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.57	+0.12

Drawdowns

JMSSX vs. SEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSSX drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum SEEGX drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSSX and SEEGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMSSX	SEEGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.68%	-62.09%	+29.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.54%	-16.82%	+8.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.68%	-21.50%	+6.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	-31.23%	+5.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.68%	-31.85%	-0.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.40%	-16.90%	+12.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	5.89%	-3.97%

Volatility

JMSSX vs. SEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2045 Fund (JMSSX) is 3.48%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that JMSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMSSX	SEEGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	3.87%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.92%	11.22%	-2.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.19%	15.60%	-4.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.43%	20.19%	-5.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.40%	21.60%	-6.20%

JMSSX vs. SEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSSX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than SEEGX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMSSX vs. SEEGX - Dividend Comparison

JMSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than SEEGX's 10.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JMSSX JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2045 Fund	2.03%	2.27%	2.04%	1.94%	1.73%	3.92%	1.20%	2.39%	5.57%	1.91%	2.02%	2.06%
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund	10.61%	11.44%	2.00%	0.12%	3.42%	14.92%	5.27%	12.85%	15.97%	14.79%	9.88%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMSSX and SEEGX in my portfolio?

JMSSX and SEEGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMSSX or SEEGX?

SEEGX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to JMSSX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSSX dropped -32.68% vs SEEGX's -62.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JMSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.