PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMSCX vs. JARTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMSCX vs. JARTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative (JMSCX) and Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSCX achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly lower than JARTX's 8.23% return. Over the past 10 years, JMSCX has underperformed JARTX with an annualized return of 5.08%, while JARTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.50% annualized return.


JMSCX

1D
0.30%
1M
3.21%
YTD
5.62%
6M
6.10%
1Y
14.44%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
5.08%

JARTX

1D
-0.52%
1M
7.14%
YTD
8.23%
6M
7.92%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
22.99%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
16.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSCX vs. JARTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMSCX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative
5.63%12.82%6.61%9.53%-16.89%4.04%14.16%12.08%-5.05%12.88%
JARTX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund
8.23%17.88%27.76%39.50%-33.81%22.30%38.69%36.30%1.10%29.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JMSCX and JARTX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.80

The correlation between JMSCX and JARTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMSCX vs. JARTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSCX
JMSCX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
JMSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

JARTX
JARTX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
JARTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JARTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
JARTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
JARTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
JARTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSCX vs. JARTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative (JMSCX) and Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMSCXJARTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.27

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

1.42

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

4.62

+7.06

JMSCX vs. JARTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the JARTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSCX and JARTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMSCXJARTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.56

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.52

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.77

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.59

0.00

Drawdowns

JMSCX vs. JARTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSCX drawdown since its inception was -28.37%, smaller than the maximum JARTX drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSCX and JARTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSCXJARTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.37%

-56.70%

+28.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.40%

-19.19%

+13.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.06%

-22.22%

+14.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.04%

-41.09%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.04%

-41.09%

+17.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.52%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-16.84%

+12.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

5.88%

-4.62%

Volatility

JMSCX vs. JARTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative (JMSCX) is 2.45%, while Janus Henderson Forty Fund (JARTX) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that JMSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JARTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMSCXJARTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

4.46%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.56%

13.43%

-7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.69%

17.41%

-10.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

21.99%

-13.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.55%

21.45%

-13.90%

JMSCX vs. JARTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSCX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than JARTX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMSCX vs. JARTX - Dividend Comparison

JMSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than JARTX's 12.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JARTX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund
12.61%13.65%11.51%9.10%0.06%10.26%8.38%7.05%8.95%14.50%6.57%15.93%
JMSCX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative
2.21%2.34%2.40%1.68%2.37%10.31%4.68%4.85%4.01%5.93%1.28%5.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMSCX and JARTX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JARTX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to JMSCX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSCX dropped -28.37% vs JARTX's -56.70%.

JMSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMSCX and JARTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer