JMRE.L vs. FCBR.L
JMRE.L (JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) and FCBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - JMRE.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while FCBR.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMRE.L returned 8.79%/yr vs 16.40%/yr for FCBR.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JMRE.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FCBR.L.
Performance
JMRE.L vs. FCBR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMRE.L achieves a 31.45% return, which is significantly higher than FCBR.L's 28.81% return.
JMRE.L
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 10.96%
- YTD
- 31.45%
- 6M
- 33.94%
- 1Y
- 62.35%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- —
FCBR.L
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 38.03%
- YTD
- 28.81%
- 6M
- 25.28%
- 1Y
- 26.33%
- 3Y*
- 23.34%
- 5Y*
- 16.40%
- 10Y*
- —
JMRE.L vs. FCBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMRE.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 31.45% | 25.64% | 8.21% | 2.02% | -12.02% | -1.26% | 30.67% |
FCBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 28.81% | -0.06% | 20.93% | 33.00% | -18.86% | 21.41% | 27.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMRE.L and FCBR.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020 | 0.41 |
The correlation between JMRE.L and FCBR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JMRE.L vs. FCBR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
Financial Services
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
-
Communication Services
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
Industrials
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
Basic Materials
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
-
Energy
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
-
Healthcare
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
-
Consumer Defensive
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
-
Utilities
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
-
Real Estate
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMRE.L vs. FCBR.L — Risk / Return Rank
JMRE.L
FCBR.L
JMRE.L vs. FCBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMRE.L | FCBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.22 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.90 | 1.08 | +4.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.57 | 2.47 | +18.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMRE.L | FCBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70 | 1.07 | +2.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.72 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.75 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
JMRE.L vs. FCBR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMRE.L drawdown since its inception was -31.64%, which is greater than FCBR.L's maximum drawdown of -26.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMRE.L and FCBR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMRE.L | FCBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.64% | -26.10% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -24.30% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.91% | -25.43% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -26.10% | +0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.58% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -9.02% | -5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 10.62% | -7.60% |
Volatility
JMRE.L vs. FCBR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JMRE.L) is 7.44%, while First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) has a volatility of 10.97%. This indicates that JMRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMRE.L | FCBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 10.97% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.31% | 21.58% | -7.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 24.65% | -7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.62% | 22.85% | +3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 22.81% | +3.34% |
JMRE.L vs. FCBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMRE.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FCBR.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMRE.L vs. FCBR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither JMRE.L nor FCBR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JMRE.L and FCBR.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMRE.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMRE.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FCBR.L.
JMRE.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FCBR.L is Technology Equities. JMRE.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while FCBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JMRE.L and 0.60% for FCBR.L.
Find the right allocation for JMRE.L and FCBR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer