JMMF vs. COMB
JMMF (JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. JMMF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
JMMF vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMMF achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 14.97% return.
JMMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMB
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -9.91%
- YTD
- 14.97%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
JMMF vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.63% | 0.17% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 14.97% | -0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMMF and COMB is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMMF vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
JMMF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COMB
JMMF vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMMF | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMMF vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.14%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMMF and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMMF | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -33.50% | +33.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.28% | +13.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -12.04% | +12.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility
JMMF vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMMF | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51% | 17.34% | -16.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 16.69% | -16.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 15.14% | -14.63% |
JMMF vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMMF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JMMF vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
JMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than COMB's 7.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.87% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.80% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMMF and COMB have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMMF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMMF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for COMB.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.87%, compared with 1.80% for JMMF.
JMMF is categorized as Money Market, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for JMMF and 0.25% for COMB.
Find the right allocation for JMMF and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer