JMMF vs. COM
JMMF (JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF) and COM (Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while COM is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index. JMMF is actively managed, while COM is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. JMMF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for COM.
Performance
JMMF vs. COM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMMF achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than COM's 14.89% return.
JMMF
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COM
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 21.16%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- —
JMMF vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.82% | 0.17% |
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 14.89% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMMF and COM is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMMF vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank
JMMF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COM
JMMF vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMMF | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMMF vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.14%, smaller than the maximum COM drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMMF and COM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMMF | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -15.95% | +15.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.60% | +4.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -6.28% | +6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.56% | — |
Volatility
JMMF vs. COM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMMF | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51% | 10.37% | -9.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 9.50% | -8.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 9.75% | -9.24% |
JMMF vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMMF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMMF vs. COM - Dividend Comparison
JMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than COM's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.53% | 2.99% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 8.59% | 10.32% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 2.36% | 0.09% |
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 2.00% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMMF and COM have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMMF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMMF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for COM.
COM has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.00% for JMMF.
JMMF is categorized as Money Market, while COM is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for JMMF and 0.70% for COM.
Find the right allocation for JMMF and COM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer