JMMF vs. AFIF
JMMF (JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF) and AFIF (Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while AFIF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. JMMF charges 0.16%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for AFIF.
Performance
JMMF vs. AFIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JMMF having a 1.63% return and AFIF slightly lower at 1.61%.
JMMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFIF
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- —
JMMF vs. AFIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.63% | 0.17% |
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 1.61% | 0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMMF and AFIF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMMF vs. AFIF — Risk / Return Rank
JMMF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AFIF
JMMF vs. AFIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMMF | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMMF vs. AFIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.14%, smaller than the maximum AFIF drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMMF and AFIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMMF | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -10.29% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -2.21% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.37% | — |
Volatility
JMMF vs. AFIF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMMF | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51% | 2.74% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 4.40% | -3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 6.24% | -5.73% |
JMMF vs. AFIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMMF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than AFIF's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMMF vs. AFIF - Dividend Comparison
JMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than AFIF's 3.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 3.73% | 3.52% | 5.61% | 5.91% | 3.49% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 2.54% | 0.69% |
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.80% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMMF and AFIF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMMF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMMF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for AFIF.
AFIF has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 1.80% for JMMF.
JMMF is categorized as Money Market, while AFIF is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Regents Park Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for JMMF and 1.08% for AFIF.
Find the right allocation for JMMF and AFIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer