JMM vs. NSBRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund (JMM) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX).
JMM is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 30, 1988. NSBRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 28, 2006.
Performance
JMM vs. NSBRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JMM vs. NSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMM Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund | -0.57% | 5.61% | 8.15% | 6.57% | -17.95% | 10.53% | 1.77% | 13.56% | -5.37% | 10.58% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | -2.40% | 10.03% | 17.56% | 15.08% | -9.63% | 27.17% | 9.79% | 41.88% | -4.36% | 20.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMM achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly higher than NSBRX's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, JMM has underperformed NSBRX with an annualized return of 3.43%, while NSBRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.
JMM
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -3.93%
- 1Y
- 0.23%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.43%
NSBRX
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JMM vs. NSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NSBRX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JMM vs. NSBRX — Risk / Return Rank
JMM
NSBRX
JMM vs. NSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund (JMM) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMM | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 0.61 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.12 | 0.97 | -0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.14 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 0.82 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.23 | 3.53 | -3.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMM | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 0.61 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.66 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.75 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.58 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between JMM and NSBRX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JMM vs. NSBRX - Dividend Comparison
JMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than NSBRX's 9.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMM Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund | 5.88% | 5.76% | 5.48% | 5.58% | 6.13% | 4.60% | 4.49% | 4.86% | 5.34% | 5.63% | 6.19% | 6.76% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 9.19% | 9.26% | 6.82% | 3.01% | 3.58% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 15.68% | 7.04% | 4.57% | 1.75% | 6.24% |
Drawdowns
JMM vs. NSBRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMM drawdown since its inception was -48.15%, which is greater than NSBRX's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMM and NSBRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMM | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.15% | -45.14% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -10.75% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -19.79% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.48% | -33.69% | +7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.57% | -6.10% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.14% | -5.28% | -8.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.50% | +0.64% |
Volatility
JMM vs. NSBRX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund (JMM) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) at 4.11%. This indicates that JMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JMM | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 4.11% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 7.73% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 15.14% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.30% | 14.29% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 16.59% | -2.69% |