PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMLP.DE vs. G1CD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMLP.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMLP.DE achieves a 27.39% return, which is significantly lower than G1CD.DE's 35.16% return.


JMLP.DE

1D
-1.02%
1M
0.18%
YTD
27.39%
6M
24.82%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
23.96%
10Y*

G1CD.DE

1D
-0.69%
1M
3.11%
YTD
35.16%
6M
37.55%
1Y
83.64%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMLP.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JMLP.DE
HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF
27.39%-5.93%44.53%15.63%20.04%
G1CD.DE
Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist
35.16%28.09%-22.10%-13.60%-7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between JMLP.DE and G1CD.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022

0.25

The correlation between JMLP.DE and G1CD.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMLP.DE vs. G1CD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMLP.DE
JMLP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMLP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMLP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JMLP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMLP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

G1CD.DE
G1CD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
G1CD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G1CD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
G1CD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
G1CD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
G1CD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMLP.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMLP.DEG1CD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.62

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

7.85

-5.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

27.83

-21.79

JMLP.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the G1CD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMLP.DE and G1CD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMLP.DEG1CD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

3.90

-2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

0.07

+1.28

Drawdowns

JMLP.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMLP.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum G1CD.DE drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMLP.DE and G1CD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMLP.DEG1CD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-64.00%

+41.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-10.60%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.29%

-52.73%

+30.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.15%

-16.50%

+11.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-35.01%

+29.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

3.00%

+1.05%

Volatility

JMLP.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) is 6.65%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that JMLP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G1CD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMLP.DEG1CD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

8.16%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

14.33%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

21.33%

-2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

25.12%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.66%

25.12%

-3.46%

JMLP.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMLP.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than G1CD.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMLP.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Dividend Comparison

JMLP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than G1CD.DE's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
G1CD.DE
Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist
1.52%2.08%1.37%0.70%0.09%0.00%0.00%
JMLP.DE
HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF
2.77%3.38%5.41%11.39%11.27%14.07%8.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMLP.DE and G1CD.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JMLP.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JMLP.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for G1CD.DE.

JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend, while G1CD.DE tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for JMLP.DE and 0.60% for G1CD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMLP.DE and G1CD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer