PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMID vs. TEKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMID vs. TEKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMID achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly lower than TEKX's 78.46% return.


JMID

1D
0.81%
1M
4.35%
YTD
10.46%
6M
9.00%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TEKX

1D
-0.91%
1M
27.16%
YTD
78.46%
6M
62.40%
1Y
153.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMID vs. TEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JMID
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
10.46%5.56%11.37%
TEKX
SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF
78.46%40.92%7.43%

Correlation

The correlation between JMID and TEKX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024

0.71

The correlation between JMID and TEKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

JMID vs. TEKX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JMID
TEKX

Industrials

27.2%
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

20.6%
1.5%

Technology

18.4%
46.4%

Healthcare

13.9%

-

Financial Services

6.0%
26.9%

Communication Services

4.0%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
1.3%

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Energy

2.0%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.3%
3.3%

Utilities

0.9%
3.1%

Industrials

JMID
27.2%
TEKX
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

JMID
20.6%
TEKX
1.5%

Technology

JMID
18.4%
TEKX
46.4%

Healthcare

JMID
13.9%
TEKX

-

Financial Services

JMID
6.0%
TEKX
26.9%

Communication Services

JMID
4.0%
TEKX
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

JMID
3.5%
TEKX
1.3%

Real Estate

JMID
2.4%
TEKX

-

Energy

JMID
2.0%
TEKX
1.8%

Basic Materials

JMID
1.3%
TEKX
3.3%

Utilities

JMID
0.9%
TEKX
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMID vs. TEKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMID
JMID Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMID Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
JMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMID Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TEKX
TEKX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMID vs. TEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMIDTEKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.55

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

8.62

-7.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

28.47

-24.05

JMID vs. TEKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the TEKX Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMID and TEKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMIDTEKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

4.13

-3.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

1.92

-1.14

Drawdowns

JMID vs. TEKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMID drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, smaller than the maximum TEKX drawdown of -45.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMID and TEKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMIDTEKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.58%

-45.57%

+19.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.82%

-17.92%

+7.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.49%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-10.28%

+5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

5.42%

-2.20%

Volatility

JMID vs. TEKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) is 4.23%, while SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX) has a volatility of 10.10%. This indicates that JMID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMIDTEKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

10.10%

-5.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

29.57%

-16.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

37.44%

-20.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

44.46%

-22.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

44.46%

-22.88%

JMID vs. TEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMID has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TEKX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMID vs. TEKX - Dividend Comparison

JMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than TEKX's 0.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JMID and TEKX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEKX has higher volatility (10.10%) compared to JMID (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMID dropped -25.58% vs TEKX's -45.57%.

On 1-year performance, TEKX leads with 153.57% vs 14.19% for JMID. On fees, JMID is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JMID has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEKX has performed better with a 153.57% return vs 14.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMID is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TEKX.

JMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.20% for TEKX.

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and State Street Global Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JMID and 0.65% for TEKX.

TEKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMID and TEKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer