JMGRX vs. LSHAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Enterprise Fund Class I (JMGRX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX).
JMGRX is a passively managed fund by Janus Henderson that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap® Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 1, 1992. LSHAX is managed by Kinetics. It was launched on May 4, 2007.
Performance
JMGRX vs. LSHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JMGRX vs. LSHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMGRX Janus Enterprise Fund Class I | -8.45% | 7.66% | 15.28% | 18.03% | -15.99% | 17.07% | 20.43% | 35.28% | -0.88% | 26.36% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 50.22% | -19.53% | 82.16% | -19.74% | 39.45% | 42.75% | 5.23% | 31.30% | -8.18% | 15.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMGRX achieves a -8.45% return, which is significantly lower than LSHAX's 50.22% return. Over the past 10 years, JMGRX has underperformed LSHAX with an annualized return of 11.30%, while LSHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.52% annualized return.
JMGRX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- -8.45%
- 6M
- -6.83%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
LSHAX
- 1D
- -7.12%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- 50.22%
- 6M
- 41.09%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.23%
- 5Y*
- 17.40%
- 10Y*
- 19.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JMGRX vs. LSHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMGRX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than LSHAX's 1.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JMGRX vs. LSHAX — Risk / Return Rank
JMGRX
LSHAX
JMGRX vs. LSHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Enterprise Fund Class I (JMGRX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMGRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | 0.17 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.35 | 0.53 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.07 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | 0.12 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | 0.19 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMGRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 0.17 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.52 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.65 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.35 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between JMGRX and LSHAX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JMGRX vs. LSHAX - Dividend Comparison
JMGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, more than LSHAX's 7.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMGRX Janus Enterprise Fund Class I | 8.15% | 7.46% | 6.97% | 7.46% | 10.42% | 15.91% | 8.44% | 4.47% | 6.42% | 1.77% | 1.81% | 3.63% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 7.71% | 11.59% | 4.66% | 9.40% | 1.76% | 0.11% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 4.85% | 3.94% | 1.84% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JMGRX vs. LSHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMGRX drawdown since its inception was -55.48%, smaller than the maximum LSHAX drawdown of -69.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMGRX and LSHAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMGRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.48% | -69.03% | +13.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -37.04% | +24.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.21% | -45.79% | +21.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.25% | -50.78% | +12.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.39% | -15.53% | +4.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -21.94% | +16.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 24.25% | -20.70% |
Volatility
JMGRX vs. LSHAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Enterprise Fund Class I (JMGRX) is 4.44%, while Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that JMGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JMGRX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 9.76% | -5.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 27.25% | -17.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.50% | 40.86% | -22.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 33.69% | -16.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 30.16% | -11.51% |