JMGMX vs. MMGPX
JMGMX (JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6) and MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, JMGMX returned 5.49%/yr vs -7.52%/yr for MMGPX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMGMX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for MMGPX.
Performance
JMGMX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMGMX achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -2.47% return.
JMGMX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 14.41%
MMGPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -6.19%
- 1Y
- -6.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- -7.52%
- 10Y*
- —
JMGMX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMGMX JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 6.22% | 8.86% | 22.68% | 23.35% | -26.95% | 10.89% | 48.58% | 40.03% | -4.88% | 24.07% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | -2.47% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMGMX and MMGPX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between JMGMX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMGMX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank
JMGMX
MMGPX
JMGMX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JMGMX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMGMX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.97 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | -0.30 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | -0.60 | +2.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMGMX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMGMX drawdown since its inception was -37.07%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMGMX and MMGPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMGMX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.07% | -75.38% | +38.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.11% | -27.79% | +13.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.50% | -29.27% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.07% | -72.70% | +35.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -41.72% | +40.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -30.30% | +22.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 13.70% | -9.26% |
Volatility
JMGMX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JMGMX) is 6.39%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that JMGMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMGMX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 9.69% | -3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.37% | 21.69% | -7.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 28.52% | -10.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 39.82% | -17.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 35.21% | -13.24% |
JMGMX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMGMX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMGMX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison
JMGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.51%, more than MMGPX's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMGMX JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 8.51% | 9.04% | 14.16% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 8.62% | 10.47% | 7.13% | 7.14% | 6.32% | 0.04% | 5.26% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.44% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMGMX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to JMGMX (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMGMX dropped -37.07% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.
JMGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMGMX and MMGPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer