PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMBS vs. JBBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMBS vs. JBBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMBS achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than JBBB's 1.86% return.


JMBS

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.73%
1Y
7.18%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*

JBBB

1D
0.02%
1M
0.62%
YTD
1.86%
6M
2.34%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMBS vs. JBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.51%8.82%1.53%5.66%-10.65%
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
1.86%5.43%12.50%17.63%-5.99%

Correlation

The correlation between JMBS and JBBB is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022

0.08

The correlation between JMBS and JBBB shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (3 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMBS vs. JBBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMBS
JMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
JMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

JBBB
JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMBS vs. JBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMBSJBBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.31

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

7.84

-0.05

JMBS vs. JBBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the JBBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMBS and JBBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMBSJBBBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.70

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

1.31

-0.89

Drawdowns

JMBS vs. JBBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMBS drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, which is greater than JBBB's maximum drawdown of -10.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBS and JBBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMBSJBBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.68%

-10.57%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-2.46%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.76%

-3.82%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

0.00%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-1.58%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.72%

+0.20%

Volatility

JMBS vs. JBBB - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.65% compared to Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) at 0.45%. This indicates that JMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMBSJBBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

0.45%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

2.76%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

3.34%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.49%

5.26%

+1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.52%

5.26%

+0.26%

JMBS vs. JBBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMBS has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than JBBB's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMBS vs. JBBB - Dividend Comparison

JMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, less than JBBB's 7.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
7.13%8.41%9.24%8.71%5.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.19%5.03%5.53%4.38%2.73%1.16%2.92%3.63%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMBS and JBBB have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMBS has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to JBBB (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMBS dropped -16.68% vs JBBB's -10.57%.

On 3-year performance, JBBB leads with 10.60% vs 4.66% for JMBS. On fees, JMBS is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, JBBB has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JBBB has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMBS is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.

JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 5.19% for JMBS.

JMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while JBBB is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for JMBS and 0.49% for JBBB.

JBBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMBS and JBBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer