JMBS vs. CLOZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ).

JMBS and CLOZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JMBS is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 12, 2018. CLOZ is an actively managed fund by Panagram. It was launched on Jan 23, 2023.

Performance

JMBS vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JMBS vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JMBS Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.19%	8.82%	1.53%	2.17%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	-1.92%	5.99%	11.85%	14.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMBS achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's -1.92% return.

JMBS

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 1.96%
• 1Y: 5.68%
• 3Y*: 4.22%
• 5Y*: 0.74%
• 10Y*: —

CLOZ

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: -1.92%
• 6M: -0.71%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: 9.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMBS vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMBS has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

CLOZ

Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF

JMBS

Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF

Return for Risk

JMBS vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMBS

JMBS Risk / Return Rank: 65
JMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
JMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
JMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 59
JMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
JMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 55

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 47
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMBS vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JMBS	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	0.78	+0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.04	+0.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.22	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	1.10	+0.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.24	3.53	+1.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JMBS vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMBS and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JMBS	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	0.78	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	2.51	-2.09

Correlation

The correlation between JMBS and CLOZ is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

JMBS vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

JMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, less than CLOZ's 7.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JMBS Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.58%	5.03%	5.53%	4.38%	2.73%	1.16%	2.92%	3.63%	0.89%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	7.97%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

JMBS vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMBS drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBS and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMBS	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.68%	-5.32%	-11.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.01%	-3.90%	+0.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	-3.15%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.95%	-0.36%	-3.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	1.22%	-0.12%

Volatility

JMBS vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 1.35%. This indicates that JMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMBS	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.96%	1.35%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.86%	2.90%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.85%	5.48%	-0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.43%	3.82%	+2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.54%	3.82%	+1.72%