PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMBP.L vs. UBXX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMBP.L vs. UBXX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) and UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JMBP.L is traded in GBP, while UBXX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UBXX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMBP.L achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than UBXX.L's 2.14% return.


JMBP.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.00%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.99%
1Y
10.82%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*

UBXX.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.65%
1Y
8.00%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMBP.L vs. UBXX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
1.62%13.12%1.60%8.37%-17.57%-2.86%3.66%2.41%
UBXX.L
UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis
2.14%9.71%7.01%7.14%-11.07%-0.10%1.69%0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between JMBP.L and UBXX.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2019

0.76

The correlation between JMBP.L and UBXX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMBP.L vs. UBXX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMBP.L
JMBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

UBXX.L
UBXX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
UBXX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBXX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMBP.L vs. UBXX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) and UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMBP.LUBXX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.61

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

4.13

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

19.08

-8.89

JMBP.L vs. UBXX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the UBXX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMBP.L and UBXX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMBP.LUBXX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.81

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.56

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.48

-0.37

Drawdowns

JMBP.L vs. UBXX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMBP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.19%, which is greater than UBXX.L's maximum drawdown of -16.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBP.L and UBXX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMBP.LUBXX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.19%

-16.83%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.52%

-1.93%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.61%

-2.59%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.88%

-16.83%

-10.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.07%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-3.72%

-6.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.42%

+0.64%

Volatility

JMBP.L vs. UBXX.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis (UBXX.L) at 0.67%. This indicates that JMBP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBXX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMBP.LUBXX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

0.67%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.53%

2.32%

+2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.44%

2.85%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.49%

4.25%

+4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.58%

4.96%

+5.62%

JMBP.L vs. UBXX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMBP.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than UBXX.L's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMBP.L vs. UBXX.L - Dividend Comparison

JMBP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, less than UBXX.L's 6.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
5.75%5.61%5.83%5.24%5.16%3.70%4.42%0.00%0.00%
UBXX.L
UBS J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF hGBP dis
6.47%25.71%7.05%4.76%4.40%3.91%4.43%6.18%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMBP.L and UBXX.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JMBP.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JMBP.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for UBXX.L.

JMBP.L tracks JP Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond (GBP Hedged), while UBXX.L tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Diversified 1-5 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JMBP.L and 0.47% for UBXX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMBP.L and UBXX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer