PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMBP.L vs. TAHY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMBP.L vs. TAHY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) and Janus Henderson Haitong Asia ex-Japan High Yield Corporate USD Bond Screened Core UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TAHY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JMBP.L is traded in GBP, while TAHY.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TAHY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMBP.L achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than TAHY.L's 3.40% return.


JMBP.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.65%
6M
1.55%
YTD
1.43%
1Y
8.99%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*

TAHY.L

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.59%
6M
1.64%
YTD
3.40%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
6.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMBP.L vs. TAHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JMBP.L and TAHY.L is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2021

-0.07

The correlation between JMBP.L and TAHY.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMBP.L vs. TAHY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMBP.L
JMBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TAHY.L
TAHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TAHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TAHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMBP.L vs. TAHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) and Janus Henderson Haitong Asia ex-Japan High Yield Corporate USD Bond Screened Core UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TAHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMBP.LTAHY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.13

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

0.92

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

2.26

+6.52

JMBP.L vs. TAHY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the TAHY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMBP.L and TAHY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMBP.L vs. TAHY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMBP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.19%, smaller than the maximum TAHY.L drawdown of -40.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBP.L and TAHY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMBP.LTAHY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.19%

-40.62%

+13.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.53%

-5.98%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.61%

-7.70%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-15.32%

+14.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.75%

-21.35%

+11.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

2.43%

-1.36%

Volatility

JMBP.L vs. TAHY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) is 1.09%, while Janus Henderson Haitong Asia ex-Japan High Yield Corporate USD Bond Screened Core UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TAHY.L) has a volatility of 2.17%. This indicates that JMBP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAHY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMBP.LTAHY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

2.17%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.61%

5.89%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.47%

7.52%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.49%

14.73%

-6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.44%

14.73%

-4.29%

JMBP.L vs. TAHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMBP.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TAHY.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMBP.L vs. TAHY.L - Dividend Comparison

JMBP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, while TAHY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
5.84%5.61%5.83%5.24%5.16%3.70%4.42%
TAHY.L
Janus Henderson Haitong Asia ex-Japan High Yield Corporate USD Bond Screened Core UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMBP.L and TAHY.L have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JMBP.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JMBP.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TAHY.L.

JMBP.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while TAHY.L is High Yield Bonds. JMBP.L tracks JP Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond (GBP Hedged), while TAHY.L tracks iBoxx MSCI Scored & Screened Tilted USD Asia ex-Japan High Yield Capped TCA Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JMBP.L and 0.60% for TAHY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMBP.L and TAHY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer