JMBP.L vs. EMLI.L
JMBP.L (JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)) and EMLI.L (PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - JMBP.L tracks the JP Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond (GBP Hedged) while EMLI.L tracks the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMBP.L returned 0.77%/yr vs 4.41%/yr for EMLI.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JMBP.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for EMLI.L.
Performance
JMBP.L vs. EMLI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JMBP.L is traded in GBP, while EMLI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMLI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMBP.L achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than EMLI.L's 2.05% return.
JMBP.L
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 10.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- —
EMLI.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
JMBP.L vs. EMLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMBP.L JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) | 1.62% | 13.12% | 1.60% | 8.37% | -17.57% | -2.86% | 3.66% | 2.41% |
EMLI.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 2.05% | 8.31% | -1.55% | 8.00% | 5.61% | -4.62% | -1.08% | 0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMBP.L and EMLI.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2019 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMBP.L vs. EMLI.L — Risk / Return Rank
JMBP.L
EMLI.L
JMBP.L vs. EMLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMBP.L | EMLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.24 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 2.10 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.19 | 6.03 | +4.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMBP.L | EMLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.32 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.43 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.35 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
JMBP.L vs. EMLI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMBP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.19%, which is greater than EMLI.L's maximum drawdown of -20.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBP.L and EMLI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMBP.L | EMLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.19% | -20.70% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.52% | -4.47% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.61% | -4.66% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.88% | -12.78% | -14.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -2.34% | +2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.99% | -5.87% | -4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 1.56% | -0.50% |
Volatility
JMBP.L vs. EMLI.L - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L) have volatilities of 1.96% and 2.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMBP.L | EMLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 2.06% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.53% | 5.98% | -1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.44% | 7.12% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.49% | 10.22% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 11.02% | -0.44% |
JMBP.L vs. EMLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMBP.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLI.L's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMBP.L vs. EMLI.L - Dividend Comparison
JMBP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, less than EMLI.L's 6.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLI.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 6.55% | 5.81% | 6.33% | 5.70% | 5.21% | 4.50% | 3.68% | 5.24% | 5.83% | 5.76% | 6.69% | 7.09% |
JMBP.L JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) | 5.75% | 5.61% | 5.83% | 5.24% | 5.16% | 3.70% | 4.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMBP.L and EMLI.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMBP.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMBP.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EMLI.L.
JMBP.L tracks JP Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond (GBP Hedged), while EMLI.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JMBP.L and 0.61% for EMLI.L.
Find the right allocation for JMBP.L and EMLI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer