JMBA.DE vs. ICGB.DE
JMBA.DE (JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF) and ICGB.DE (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - JMBA.DE tracks the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index while ICGB.DE tracks the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMBA.DE returned 1.93%/yr vs 3.74%/yr for ICGB.DE. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JMBA.DE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ICGB.DE.
Performance
JMBA.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMBA.DE achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than ICGB.DE's 8.51% return.
JMBA.DE
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 1Y
- 10.91%
- 3Y*
- 6.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- —
ICGB.DE
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 9.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- —
JMBA.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMBA.DE JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF | 4.33% | 0.84% | 7.77% | 5.79% | -10.80% | 5.58% | -4.14% | -7.72% |
ICGB.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 8.51% | -7.16% | 11.36% | -2.27% | 1.10% | 17.31% | 0.08% | 0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMBA.DE and ICGB.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, JMBA.DE and ICGB.DE have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMBA.DE vs. ICGB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
JMBA.DE
ICGB.DE
JMBA.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ICGB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMBA.DE | ICGB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.32 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 3.33 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.71 | 8.75 | +2.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMBA.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.66%, which is greater than ICGB.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBA.DE and ICGB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMBA.DE | ICGB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.66% | -13.36% | -13.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.14% | -2.77% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.45% | -11.17% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.09% | -13.36% | -0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -1.22% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.27% | -6.40% | -4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 1.06% | -0.03% |
Volatility
JMBA.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Volatility Comparison
JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ICGB.DE) at 1.31%. This indicates that JMBA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICGB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMBA.DE | ICGB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.53% | 1.31% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.11% | 3.60% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.05% | 5.40% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 6.63% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.70% | 7.90% | +2.80% |
JMBA.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMBA.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ICGB.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMBA.DE vs. ICGB.DE - Dividend Comparison
JMBA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICGB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICGB.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.68% | 1.92% | 2.22% | 2.58% | 2.80% | 2.71% | 2.63% | 0.95% |
JMBA.DE JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMBA.DE and ICGB.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICGB.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICGB.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JMBA.DE.
JMBA.DE tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index, while ICGB.DE tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JMBA.DE and 0.35% for ICGB.DE.
Find the right allocation for JMBA.DE and ICGB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer