ICGB.DE vs. CGB.DE
ICGB.DE (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CGB.DE (Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - ICGB.DE tracks the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index while CGB.DE tracks the FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond 1-10 Years Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ICGB.DE returned 3.84%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for CGB.DE. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ICGB.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CGB.DE.
Performance
ICGB.DE vs. CGB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ICGB.DE having a 7.85% return and CGB.DE slightly higher at 8.00%.
ICGB.DE
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- —
CGB.DE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 1Y
- 11.41%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
ICGB.DE vs. CGB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICGB.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 7.85% | -7.16% | 11.36% | -2.27% | 1.10% | 17.31% | 0.08% | -10.15% |
CGB.DE Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 8.00% | -6.58% | 9.93% | -2.82% | -0.10% | 15.85% | -0.38% | -0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICGB.DE and CGB.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between ICGB.DE and CGB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICGB.DE vs. CGB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ICGB.DE
CGB.DE
ICGB.DE vs. CGB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ICGB.DE) and Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (CGB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICGB.DE | CGB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 4.02 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.25 | 11.91 | -2.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICGB.DE vs. CGB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICGB.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.36%, smaller than the maximum CGB.DE drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICGB.DE and CGB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICGB.DE | CGB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -20.06% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -2.83% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.17% | -11.08% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.36% | -13.94% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -0.94% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | -9.28% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 0.96% | +0.10% |
Volatility
ICGB.DE vs. CGB.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ICGB.DE) is 1.34%, while Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (CGB.DE) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that ICGB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICGB.DE | CGB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 1.70% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.71% | 4.01% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.38% | 5.81% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.64% | 6.74% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.91% | 11.06% | -3.15% |
ICGB.DE vs. CGB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICGB.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CGB.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICGB.DE vs. CGB.DE - Dividend Comparison
ICGB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than CGB.DE's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGB.DE Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.00% | 2.40% | 2.37% | 2.97% | 4.40% | 2.17% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 0.72% | 2.64% | 0.38% |
ICGB.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.69% | 1.92% | 2.22% | 2.58% | 2.80% | 2.71% | 2.63% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICGB.DE and CGB.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGB.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGB.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ICGB.DE.
ICGB.DE tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while CGB.DE tracks FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond 1-10 Years Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ICGB.DE and 0.20% for CGB.DE.
Find the right allocation for ICGB.DE and CGB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer