PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMBA.DE vs. EM1C.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMBA.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) and VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JMBA.DE having a 4.34% return and EM1C.DE slightly lower at 4.27%.


JMBA.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
0.65%
6M
3.04%
YTD
4.34%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*

EM1C.DE

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.23%
6M
2.39%
YTD
4.27%
1Y
8.95%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMBA.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JMBA.DE
JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
4.34%0.84%7.77%5.79%-10.80%5.58%-4.14%-7.72%
EM1C.DE
VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF
4.27%4.52%3.70%6.43%-4.55%-2.31%-6.15%2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between JMBA.DE and EM1C.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.56

The correlation between JMBA.DE and EM1C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMBA.DE vs. EM1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMBA.DE
JMBA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
JMBA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

EM1C.DE
EM1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EM1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EM1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMBA.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) and VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMBA.DEEM1C.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.60

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.21

8.74

+1.47

JMBA.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMBA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the EM1C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMBA.DE and EM1C.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMBA.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.66%, which is greater than EM1C.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBA.DE and EM1C.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMBA.DEEM1C.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.66%

-23.47%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-3.43%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.45%

-7.21%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.09%

-8.70%

-5.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-3.15%

+1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-13.82%

+2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.02%

+0.02%

Volatility

JMBA.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Volatility Comparison

JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) and VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (EM1C.DE) have volatilities of 1.13% and 1.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMBA.DEEM1C.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

1.12%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.03%

4.27%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

5.09%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.43%

7.04%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.70%

10.10%

+0.60%

JMBA.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMBA.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EM1C.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMBA.DE vs. EM1C.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JMBA.DE nor EM1C.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JMBA.DE and EM1C.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EM1C.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EM1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JMBA.DE.

JMBA.DE tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index, while EM1C.DE tracks JP Morgan GBI-Emerging Markets Global Core. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JMBA.DE and 0.30% for EM1C.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMBA.DE and EM1C.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer