PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLKUX vs. FVTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLKUX vs. FVTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX) and Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K6 (FVTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLKUX achieves a 12.46% return, which is significantly lower than FVTKX's 13.86% return.


JLKUX

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.20%
6M
8.87%
YTD
12.46%
1Y
17.01%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*
10.58%

FVTKX

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.42%
6M
10.28%
YTD
13.86%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLKUX vs. FVTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLKUX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
12.46%12.97%15.52%18.68%-19.64%15.82%20.34%24.86%-8.96%6.82%
FVTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K6
13.86%24.13%14.37%20.86%-18.11%16.79%18.59%25.60%-8.68%9.82%

Correlation

The correlation between JLKUX and FVTKX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.95

The correlation between JLKUX and FVTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLKUX vs. FVTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKUX
JLKUX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
JLKUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FVTKX
FVTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FVTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FVTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLKUX vs. FVTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX) and Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K6 (FVTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLKUXFVTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.74

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.50

11.79

-4.29

JLKUX vs. FVTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLKUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the FVTKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKUX and FVTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JLKUX vs. FVTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKUX drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, roughly equal to the maximum FVTKX drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKUX and FVTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLKUXFVTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.07%

-30.94%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.86%

-9.81%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.88%

-15.35%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.12%

-27.12%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-1.04%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-5.41%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

2.27%

+0.19%

Volatility

JLKUX vs. FVTKX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKUX) and Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K6 (FVTKX) have volatilities of 4.48% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLKUXFVTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

4.71%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.77%

12.22%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.15%

14.18%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.41%

15.28%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

15.95%

+0.55%

JLKUX vs. FVTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLKUX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FVTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLKUX vs. FVTKX - Dividend Comparison

JLKUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than FVTKX's 5.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K6
5.04%3.87%2.52%2.26%10.84%10.41%4.04%6.19%6.19%2.46%0.00%0.00%
JLKUX
John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
1.67%1.87%3.23%3.28%15.00%9.92%4.36%8.74%11.46%3.34%4.83%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, JLKUX and FVTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FVTKX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to JLKUX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLKUX dropped -32.07% vs FVTKX's -30.94%.

FVTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLKUX and FVTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer