PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLJAX vs. JVLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLJAX vs. JVLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JLJAX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLJAX achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than JVLIX's 16.63% return. Over the past 10 years, JLJAX has underperformed JVLIX with an annualized return of 10.82%, while JVLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.


JLJAX

1D
0.40%
1M
5.26%
YTD
12.50%
6M
13.33%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
10.82%

JVLIX

1D
1.02%
1M
6.70%
YTD
16.63%
6M
17.45%
1Y
33.27%
3Y*
21.71%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*
12.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLJAX vs. JVLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLJAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
12.50%17.82%14.21%17.83%-19.96%15.45%19.87%24.36%-9.27%18.23%
JVLIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund
16.63%17.48%15.59%13.91%-4.45%29.92%1.59%22.70%-9.75%17.97%

Correlation

The correlation between JLJAX and JVLIX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2006

0.92

The correlation between JLJAX and JVLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLJAX vs. JVLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLJAX
JLJAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JLJAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLJAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLJAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JLJAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLJAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

JVLIX
JVLIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
JVLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
JVLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLJAX vs. JVLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JLJAX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLJAXJVLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.50

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

4.31

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.06

18.35

-5.29

JLJAX vs. JVLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLJAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the JVLIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLJAX and JVLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLJAXJVLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.79

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.73

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.67

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.37

+0.05

Drawdowns

JLJAX vs. JVLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLJAX drawdown since its inception was -56.52%, roughly equal to the maximum JVLIX drawdown of -59.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLJAX and JVLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLJAXJVLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.52%

-59.12%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-7.95%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.84%

-20.48%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.20%

-20.48%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

-40.33%

+8.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-10.52%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.86%

+0.22%

Volatility

JLJAX vs. JVLIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JLJAX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund (JVLIX) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLJAXJVLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.87%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

9.69%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

12.27%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

17.32%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.03%

18.90%

-2.87%

JLJAX vs. JVLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLJAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than JVLIX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLJAX vs. JVLIX - Dividend Comparison

JLJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.22%, more than JVLIX's 5.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLJAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
8.22%9.25%3.13%3.11%23.82%8.89%5.40%11.84%14.16%6.67%6.98%6.32%
JVLIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund
5.69%6.64%13.97%7.22%7.16%14.63%1.57%5.87%10.59%4.60%1.22%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLJAX and JVLIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JVLIX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to JLJAX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLJAX dropped -56.52% vs JVLIX's -59.12%.

JVLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLJAX and JVLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer