PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLHAX vs. FIKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLHAX vs. FIKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLHAX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than FIKFX's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, JLHAX has outperformed FIKFX with an annualized return of 9.53%, while FIKFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.23% annualized return.


JLHAX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.89%
YTD
9.91%
6M
9.79%
1Y
22.03%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
9.53%

FIKFX

1D
0.47%
1M
0.81%
YTD
3.97%
6M
4.02%
1Y
9.61%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
4.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLHAX vs. FIKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLHAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio
9.91%16.08%11.11%15.50%-19.47%13.90%18.27%22.86%-8.60%16.86%
FIKFX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class
3.97%9.23%4.96%8.28%-11.09%2.79%8.54%10.59%-0.76%6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between JLHAX and FIKFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2009

0.78

The correlation between JLHAX and FIKFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (10 years) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLHAX vs. FIKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLHAX
JLHAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JLHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JLHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKFX
FIKFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FIKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLHAX vs. FIKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLHAXFIKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.90

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

12.61

-0.34

JLHAX vs. FIKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the FIKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLHAX and FIKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JLHAX vs. FIKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLHAX drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, which is greater than FIKFX's maximum drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLHAX and FIKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLHAXFIKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.42%

-15.03%

-41.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

-3.32%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-4.76%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.99%

-15.03%

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.14%

-15.03%

-14.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.21%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-1.72%

-6.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

0.76%

+1.01%

Volatility

JLHAX vs. FIKFX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JLHAX) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX) at 1.94%. This indicates that JLHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLHAXFIKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

1.94%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

3.69%

+5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.39%

4.29%

+6.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

5.17%

+7.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.90%

4.47%

+9.43%

JLHAX vs. FIKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLHAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKFX's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLHAX vs. FIKFX - Dividend Comparison

JLHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than FIKFX's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKFX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class
3.20%3.40%3.13%2.85%3.06%2.04%2.18%7.27%2.94%1.89%1.65%1.39%
JLHAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2035 Lifetime Portfolio
8.02%8.81%2.68%2.53%20.06%9.76%5.83%11.13%13.05%6.74%6.80%6.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLHAX and FIKFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLHAX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to FIKFX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLHAX dropped -56.42% vs FIKFX's -15.03%.

FIKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLHAX and FIKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer