JLDAX vs. FHCDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JLDAX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2020 Lifetime Portfolio) and FHCDX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, JLDAX returned 4.51%/yr vs 10.95%/yr for FHCDX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JLDAX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FHCDX.

Performance

JLDAX vs. FHCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2020 Lifetime Portfolio (JLDAX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLDAX achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than FHCDX's 14.02% return.

JLDAX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 6.24%
• 6M: 6.66%
• 1Y: 15.09%
• 3Y*: 10.69%
• 5Y*: 4.51%
• 10Y*: 6.65%

FHCDX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 5.47%
• YTD: 14.02%
• 6M: 15.56%
• 1Y: 31.25%
• 3Y*: 21.56%
• 5Y*: 10.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLDAX vs. FHCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JLDAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2020 Lifetime Portfolio	6.24%	12.30%	7.00%	11.14%	-15.05%	9.23%	13.18%	17.58%	-7.59%
FHCDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6	14.02%	22.85%	16.96%	20.69%	-18.85%	16.45%	18.05%	26.63%	-11.79%

Correlation

The correlation between JLDAX and FHCDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.94

The correlation between JLDAX and FHCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JLDAX vs. FHCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLDAX

JLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 71
JLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
JLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
JLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
JLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
JLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FHCDX

FHCDX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FHCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FHCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FHCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FHCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FHCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLDAX vs. FHCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2020 Lifetime Portfolio (JLDAX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JLDAX	FHCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.50	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	3.44	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.46	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	3.29	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.57	14.62	-1.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JLDAX vs. FHCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FHCDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLDAX and FHCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JLDAX	FHCDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	2.50	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.73	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.74	-0.33

Drawdowns

JLDAX vs. FHCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLDAX drawdown since its inception was -51.18%, which is greater than FHCDX's maximum drawdown of -31.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLDAX and FHCDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLDAX	FHCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.18%	-31.28%	-19.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.01%	-9.68%	+4.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.57%	-15.51%	+7.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.07%	-27.69%	+6.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.41%	-5.83%	-0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	2.17%	-1.05%

Volatility

JLDAX vs. FHCDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2020 Lifetime Portfolio (JLDAX) is 2.14%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that JLDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLDAX	FHCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.14%	4.22%	-2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.04%	10.46%	-5.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.11%	12.73%	-6.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.29%	15.12%	-6.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.90%	16.90%	-8.00%

JLDAX vs. FHCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLDAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FHCDX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

JLDAX vs. FHCDX - Dividend Comparison

JLDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than FHCDX's 3.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHCDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6	3.31%	2.52%	5.51%	2.05%	5.98%	8.10%	4.24%	3.04%	3.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JLDAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2020 Lifetime Portfolio	5.85%	6.21%	3.47%	3.27%	14.23%	11.32%	7.30%	9.46%	10.82%	5.85%	7.48%	7.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLDAX and FHCDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, JLDAX and FHCDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JLDAX or FHCDX?

FHCDX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to JLDAX (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLDAX dropped -51.18% vs FHCDX's -31.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JLDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.