PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLAAX vs. JVMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLAAX vs. JVMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2010 Lifetime Portfolio (JLAAX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLAAX achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than JVMIX's 8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, JLAAX has underperformed JVMIX with an annualized return of 5.43%, while JVMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.42% annualized return.


JLAAX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.36%
YTD
4.43%
6M
4.89%
1Y
11.60%
3Y*
9.03%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
5.43%

JVMIX

1D
0.88%
1M
0.88%
YTD
8.34%
6M
6.91%
1Y
17.85%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLAAX vs. JVMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLAAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2010 Lifetime Portfolio
4.43%10.84%5.89%9.84%-12.11%7.36%10.12%14.90%-4.55%7.42%
JVMIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I
8.34%11.28%10.46%16.64%-7.09%26.85%5.90%30.13%-14.90%15.10%

Correlation

The correlation between JLAAX and JVMIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2006

0.85

The correlation between JLAAX and JVMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLAAX vs. JVMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLAAX
JLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

JVMIX
JVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
JVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
JVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLAAX vs. JVMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2010 Lifetime Portfolio (JLAAX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLAAXJVMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.25

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

2.09

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.77

6.72

+6.05

JLAAX vs. JVMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the JVMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLAAX and JVMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLAAXJVMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.40

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.45

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.51

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.31

+0.17

Drawdowns

JLAAX vs. JVMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLAAX drawdown since its inception was -42.70%, smaller than the maximum JVMIX drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLAAX and JVMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLAAXJVMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.70%

-67.04%

+24.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.04%

-8.57%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.65%

-21.13%

+15.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.40%

-21.13%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.67%

-42.64%

+23.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.33%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-13.36%

+8.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

2.66%

-1.75%

Volatility

JLAAX vs. JVMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2010 Lifetime Portfolio (JLAAX) is 1.65%, while John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that JLAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JVMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLAAXJVMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

3.10%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

9.20%

-5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63%

12.77%

-8.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.44%

18.39%

-11.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.79%

20.31%

-13.52%

JLAAX vs. JVMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLAAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than JVMIX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLAAX vs. JVMIX - Dividend Comparison

JLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, less than JVMIX's 8.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLAAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2010 Lifetime Portfolio
5.55%5.79%3.93%3.75%10.30%8.10%6.86%7.67%9.05%4.02%7.14%7.81%
JVMIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I
8.53%9.24%12.05%4.02%5.27%6.67%1.13%2.40%13.85%5.94%1.91%5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLAAX and JVMIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JVMIX has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to JLAAX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLAAX dropped -42.70% vs JVMIX's -67.04%.

JLAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLAAX and JVMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer