JILGX vs. AAAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JILGX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX).
JILGX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 13, 2005. AAAAX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 30, 2007.
Performance
JILGX vs. AAAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JILGX vs. AAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILGX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio | -0.98% | 4.24% | 11.94% | 16.22% | -17.44% | 14.29% | 17.61% | 22.27% | -8.28% | 15.94% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 9.77% | 12.82% | 5.24% | 2.30% | -9.91% | 23.45% | 3.71% | 21.42% | -5.36% | 14.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JILGX achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than AAAAX's 9.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JILGX having a 7.61% annualized return and AAAAX not far behind at 7.40%.
JILGX
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- -9.22%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.34%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
AAAAX
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 17.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JILGX vs. AAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JILGX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JILGX vs. AAAAX — Risk / Return Rank
JILGX
AAAAX
JILGX vs. AAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JILGX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JILGX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 1.57 | -1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 2.11 | -1.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.32 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | 1.91 | -1.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.00 | 10.22 | -10.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JILGX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 1.57 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.56 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.38 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between JILGX and AAAAX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JILGX vs. AAAAX - Dividend Comparison
JILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than AAAAX's 3.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILGX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio | 2.40% | 2.38% | 2.94% | 6.20% | 14.58% | 10.72% | 6.35% | 12.46% | 11.94% | 6.15% | 7.98% | 8.76% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 3.23% | 3.54% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 4.17% | 2.31% | 1.33% | 1.81% | 1.61% | 1.52% | 1.47% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
JILGX vs. AAAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JILGX drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, which is greater than AAAAX's maximum drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILGX and AAAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JILGX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.66% | -40.47% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | -9.55% | -4.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | -22.62% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.58% | -29.41% | -0.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.77% | -3.53% | -8.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -6.89% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 1.79% | +3.74% |
Volatility
JILGX vs. AAAAX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JILGX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX) at 3.27%. This indicates that JILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JILGX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 3.27% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 7.26% | +6.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.96% | 11.62% | +7.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 12.19% | +2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 12.66% | +1.73% |