JILAX vs. MHELX

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

JILAX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio) and MHELX (MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, JILAX returned 9.82%/yr vs 9.34%/yr for MHELX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JILAX charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for MHELX.

Performance

JILAX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio (JILAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JILAX achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 21.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JILAX having a 9.82% annualized return and MHELX not far behind at 9.34%.

JILAX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.60%
• 6M: 11.51%
• YTD: 12.42%
• 1Y: 7.00%
• 3Y*: 12.06%
• 5Y*: 5.26%
• 10Y*: 9.82%

MHELX

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 1.60%
• 6M: 22.19%
• YTD: 21.10%
• 1Y: 34.24%
• 3Y*: 14.53%
• 5Y*: 5.33%
• 10Y*: 9.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JILAX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JILAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio	12.42%	3.54%	13.76%	17.79%	-18.74%	16.71%	19.29%	25.42%	-9.89%	20.07%
MHELX MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund	21.10%	3.45%	12.51%	16.30%	-20.27%	14.07%	20.57%	22.49%	-12.76%	12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JILAX and MHELX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2005	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between JILAX and MHELX has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

JILAX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JILAX

JILAX Risk / Return Rank: 8
JILAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
JILAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
JILAX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
JILAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
JILAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

MHELX

MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 77
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JILAX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio (JILAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JILAX	MHELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	1.82	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	2.60	-1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.34	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	4.19	-3.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.34	14.07	-12.73

JILAX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JILAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JILAX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JILAX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JILAX drawdown since its inception was -57.84%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILAX and MHELX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JILAX	MHELX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.84%	-61.24%	+3.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.31%	-8.52%	-7.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.78%	-30.81%	+14.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.42%	-32.01%	+4.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.90%	-39.02%	+5.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-1.07%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.19%	-12.90%	+3.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.03%	2.54%	+3.49%

Volatility

JILAX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio (JILAX) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) at 5.87%. This indicates that JILAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JILAX	MHELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.31%	5.87%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.97%	15.91%	-3.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.20%	19.66%	-0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.24%	21.10%	-3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.38%	20.94%	-3.56%

JILAX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JILAX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

JILAX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

JILAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than MHELX's 5.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JILAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio	1.67%	1.87%	3.01%	6.18%	16.17%	11.11%	6.11%	14.22%	13.68%	7.11%	8.43%	8.42%
MHELX MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund	5.96%	0.00%	2.19%	0.00%	14.45%	5.03%	2.70%	6.13%	0.00%	5.17%	5.51%	6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JILAX and MHELX in my portfolio?

JILAX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JILAX or MHELX?

JILAX has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to MHELX (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JILAX dropped -57.84% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MHELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.