PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JILAX vs. FSRKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JILAX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio (JILAX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JILAX achieves a 13.91% return, which is significantly higher than FSRKX's 8.80% return.


JILAX

1D
0.36%
1M
5.53%
YTD
13.91%
6M
1.16%
1Y
13.24%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
9.86%

FSRKX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.80%
6M
9.07%
1Y
16.83%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JILAX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JILAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio
13.91%3.54%13.76%17.79%-18.74%16.71%19.29%8.79%
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
8.80%10.59%6.00%4.81%-3.13%16.06%3.94%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between JILAX and FSRKX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2019

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between JILAX and FSRKX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JILAX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JILAX
JILAX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
JILAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JILAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
JILAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
JILAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
JILAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRKX
FSRKX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JILAX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio (JILAX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JILAXFSRKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

3.61

-2.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

5.11

-4.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.73

-0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

8.79

-7.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.42

32.89

-30.47

JILAX vs. FSRKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JILAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the FSRKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JILAX and FSRKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JILAXFSRKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

3.61

-2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.95

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.93

-0.53

Drawdowns

JILAX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JILAX drawdown since its inception was -57.84%, which is greater than FSRKX's maximum drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILAX and FSRKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JILAXFSRKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.84%

-19.93%

-37.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.31%

-1.93%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.78%

-5.84%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.42%

-12.74%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.72%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-3.21%

-6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.99%

0.51%

+5.48%

Volatility

JILAX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio (JILAX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) at 1.33%. This indicates that JILAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JILAXFSRKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

1.33%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.77%

3.67%

+13.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

4.71%

+13.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

6.94%

+10.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

7.79%

+9.62%

JILAX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JILAX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

JILAX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison

JILAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than FSRKX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
4.25%4.83%4.98%5.38%7.38%5.43%2.31%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JILAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio
1.65%1.87%3.01%6.18%16.17%11.11%6.11%14.22%13.68%7.11%8.43%8.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


JILAX and FSRKX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JILAX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to FSRKX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JILAX dropped -57.84% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.

FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JILAX and FSRKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer