PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JILAX vs. DGIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JILAX vs. DGIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio (JILAX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JILAX achieves a 13.91% return, which is significantly lower than DGIFX's 17.45% return. Over the past 10 years, JILAX has underperformed DGIFX with an annualized return of 9.86%, while DGIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.45% annualized return.


JILAX

1D
0.36%
1M
5.53%
YTD
13.91%
6M
1.16%
1Y
13.24%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
9.86%

DGIFX

1D
0.76%
1M
6.56%
YTD
17.45%
6M
16.09%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JILAX vs. DGIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JILAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio
13.91%3.54%13.76%17.79%-18.74%16.71%19.29%25.42%-9.89%20.07%
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
17.45%3.54%21.13%33.10%-18.35%9.59%24.07%23.97%-2.39%14.86%

Correlation

The correlation between JILAX and DGIFX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2011

0.86

The correlation between JILAX and DGIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JILAX vs. DGIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JILAX
JILAX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
JILAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JILAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
JILAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
JILAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
JILAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

DGIFX
DGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JILAX vs. DGIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio (JILAX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JILAXDGIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

1.80

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

2.50

-1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

2.55

-1.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.42

7.92

-5.50

JILAX vs. DGIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JILAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the DGIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JILAX and DGIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JILAXDGIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

1.80

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.50

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.67

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.71

-0.31

Drawdowns

JILAX vs. DGIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JILAX drawdown since its inception was -57.84%, which is greater than DGIFX's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILAX and DGIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JILAXDGIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.84%

-30.93%

-26.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.31%

-10.91%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.78%

-30.93%

+14.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.42%

-30.93%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-30.93%

-2.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

0.00%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-5.90%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.99%

3.50%

+2.49%

Volatility

JILAX vs. DGIFX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio (JILAX) and Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) have volatilities of 4.05% and 4.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JILAXDGIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

4.23%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.77%

11.14%

+5.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

15.47%

+2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

21.11%

-4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

18.66%

-1.25%

JILAX vs. DGIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JILAX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DGIFX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

JILAX vs. DGIFX - Dividend Comparison

JILAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than DGIFX's 7.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
7.02%8.29%20.95%2.78%2.21%11.12%10.09%3.53%3.74%4.29%0.00%0.00%
JILAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio
1.65%1.87%3.01%6.18%16.17%11.11%6.11%14.22%13.68%7.11%8.43%8.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


JILAX and DGIFX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGIFX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to JILAX (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JILAX dropped -57.84% vs DGIFX's -30.93%.

DGIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JILAX and DGIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer