PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIJIX vs. QFVOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIJIX vs. QFVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIJIX achieves a 25.73% return, which is significantly higher than QFVOX's 19.17% return.


JIJIX

1D
-0.25%
1M
5.94%
YTD
25.73%
6M
27.80%
1Y
38.01%
3Y*
27.11%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*

QFVOX

1D
-0.24%
1M
4.66%
YTD
19.17%
6M
23.65%
1Y
37.95%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIJIX vs. QFVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JIJIX
John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund
25.73%23.10%24.88%18.92%-31.47%17.94%36.58%13.65%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
19.17%33.85%-0.70%19.88%-17.14%19.44%2.65%6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between JIJIX and QFVOX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.51

The correlation between JIJIX and QFVOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIJIX vs. QFVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIJIX
JIJIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JIJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
JIJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

QFVOX
QFVOX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QFVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QFVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIJIX vs. QFVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIJIXQFVOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.52

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

3.62

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

12.77

-3.19

JIJIX vs. QFVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIJIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the QFVOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIJIX and QFVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIJIXQFVOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.72

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.67

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.40

+0.34

Drawdowns

JIJIX vs. QFVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIJIX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum QFVOX drawdown of -70.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIJIX and QFVOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIJIXQFVOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-70.51%

+28.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.01%

-11.02%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-14.92%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.80%

-32.90%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.24%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.42%

-15.30%

+3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

3.11%

+0.97%

Volatility

JIJIX vs. QFVOX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) at 4.87%. This indicates that JIJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QFVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIJIXQFVOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.86%

4.87%

+4.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.56%

12.53%

+8.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.22%

14.69%

+8.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.48%

15.49%

+4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.10%

16.82%

+5.28%

JIJIX vs. QFVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIJIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than QFVOX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIJIX vs. QFVOX - Dividend Comparison

JIJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than QFVOX's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIJIX
John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund
2.34%2.94%0.13%0.22%0.79%30.17%5.62%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
4.75%5.66%1.95%1.88%1.43%10.11%1.58%1.14%0.98%0.60%1.02%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIJIX and QFVOX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JIJIX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to QFVOX (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIJIX dropped -41.80% vs QFVOX's -70.51%.

QFVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIJIX and QFVOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer