PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIGMX vs. STWTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIGMX vs. STWTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund (STWTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIGMX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than STWTX's 0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, JIGMX has underperformed STWTX with an annualized return of 1.63%, while STWTX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.81% annualized return.


JIGMX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.17%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
-0.47%
10Y*
1.63%

STWTX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.23%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
2.58%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
1.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIGMX vs. STWTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIGMX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4
0.03%7.50%1.36%4.55%-14.64%-1.49%9.76%8.71%-0.19%3.91%
STWTX
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund
0.97%1.67%1.33%6.86%-8.46%0.01%6.01%7.59%0.34%4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between JIGMX and STWTX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.65

The correlation between JIGMX and STWTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIGMX vs. STWTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIGMX
JIGMX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
JIGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
JIGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

STWTX
STWTX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
STWTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STWTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
STWTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
STWTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
STWTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIGMX vs. STWTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund (STWTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIGMXSTWTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.49

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.15

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

6.66

-1.80

JIGMX vs. STWTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the STWTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIGMX and STWTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIGMXSTWTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

2.19

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.05

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.46

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.75

-0.35

Drawdowns

JIGMX vs. STWTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIGMX drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, which is greater than STWTX's maximum drawdown of -14.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGMX and STWTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIGMXSTWTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-14.44%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-3.34%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.17%

-8.66%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

-14.44%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.82%

-14.44%

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.25%

-1.27%

-2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-2.61%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.08%

+0.03%

Volatility

JIGMX vs. STWTX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund (STWTX) at 1.20%. This indicates that JIGMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STWTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIGMXSTWTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

1.20%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

2.30%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

3.29%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

4.95%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

3.93%

+1.04%

JIGMX vs. STWTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIGMX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than STWTX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIGMX vs. STWTX - Dividend Comparison

JIGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than STWTX's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIGMX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4
4.17%4.10%3.82%2.43%2.57%2.34%4.61%2.92%2.92%2.77%2.83%0.00%
STWTX
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund
3.42%2.90%3.20%3.01%2.20%2.61%2.90%4.34%3.47%2.03%2.85%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIGMX and STWTX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JIGMX has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to STWTX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIGMX dropped -19.82% vs STWTX's -14.44%.

STWTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIGMX and STWTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer