PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIGB vs. JPLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JIGB vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF (JIGB) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JIGB vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIGB achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than JPLD's 0.50% return.


JIGB

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
0.14%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
4.58%
5Y*
0.48%
10Y*

JPLD

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.56%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JIGB vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIGB has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

JIGB vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIGB
JIGB Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JIGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIGB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
JIGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIGB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLD
JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIGB vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF (JIGB) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIGBJPLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

2.65

-1.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

4.08

-2.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.55

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

4.10

-2.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.98

20.00

-15.01

JIGB vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIGB Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIGB and JPLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIGBJPLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.65

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

3.30

-2.89

Correlation

The correlation between JIGB and JPLD is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

JIGB vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

JIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than JPLD's 4.22% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JIGB
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF
5.04%5.02%5.22%4.22%3.39%3.47%4.59%5.25%0.20%
JPLD
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF
4.22%4.24%4.47%1.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

JIGB vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIGB drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGB and JPLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JIGBJPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.48%

-1.17%

-21.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-1.17%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-0.62%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-0.14%

-6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.24%

+0.75%

Volatility

JIGB vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF (JIGB) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) at 0.56%. This indicates that JIGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JIGBJPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

0.56%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

0.99%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.38%

1.79%

+3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.17%

1.86%

+5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.50%

1.86%

+5.64%