PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
JIGB vs. XHLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


JIGBXHLF
YTD Return3.42%4.35%
1Y Return11.43%5.29%
Sharpe Ratio1.7411.85
Sortino Ratio2.5933.72
Omega Ratio1.317.39
Calmar Ratio0.6488.86
Martin Ratio7.19438.07
Ulcer Index1.54%0.01%
Daily Std Dev6.36%0.45%
Max Drawdown-22.48%-0.11%
Current Drawdown-7.61%-0.02%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between JIGB and XHLF is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

JIGB vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, JIGB achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly lower than XHLF's 4.35% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.05%
2.67%
JIGB
XHLF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JIGB vs. XHLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIGB has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XHLF's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


JIGB
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF
Expense ratio chart for JIGB: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%
Expense ratio chart for XHLF: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

JIGB vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF (JIGB) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIGB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for JIGB, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.88
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for JIGB, currently valued at 2.81, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for JIGB, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for JIGB, currently valued at 2.63, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.63
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for JIGB, currently valued at 7.68, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.007.68
XHLF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XHLF, currently valued at 11.85, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.0011.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XHLF, currently valued at 33.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0033.72
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XHLF, currently valued at 7.39, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.007.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XHLF, currently valued at 88.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0088.86
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XHLF, currently valued at 438.07, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00438.07

JIGB vs. XHLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the XHLF Sharpe Ratio of 11.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIGB and XHLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.005.0010.0015.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.88
11.85
JIGB
XHLF

Dividends

JIGB vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison

JIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than XHLF's 5.10% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018
JIGB
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF
4.94%4.22%3.39%3.47%4.14%3.60%0.20%
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
5.10%4.51%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

JIGB vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIGB drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, which is greater than XHLF's maximum drawdown of -0.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGB and XHLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-3.50%-3.00%-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.17%
-0.02%
JIGB
XHLF

Volatility

JIGB vs. XHLF - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF (JIGB) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) at 0.13%. This indicates that JIGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.95%
0.13%
JIGB
XHLF