JIG vs. ARKK

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

JIG (JPMorgan International Growth ETF) and ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JIG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while ARKK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by ARK. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JIG returned 3.80%/yr vs -7.72%/yr for ARKK. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JIG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKK.

Performance

JIG vs. ARKK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIG achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than ARKK's 2.04% return.

JIG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 6.44%
• YTD: 17.28%
• 6M: 20.72%
• 1Y: 26.57%
• 3Y*: 14.76%
• 5Y*: 3.80%
• 10Y*: —

ARKK

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 5.34%
• YTD: 2.04%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 22.81%
• 3Y*: 21.33%
• 5Y*: -7.72%
• 10Y*: 15.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIG vs. ARKK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JIG JPMorgan International Growth ETF	17.28%	20.10%	8.84%	13.00%	-30.57%	6.40%	40.04%
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF	2.04%	35.49%	8.40%	69.04%	-66.97%	-23.60%	104.60%

Correlation

The correlation between JIG and ARKK is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020	0.67

The correlation between JIG and ARKK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

JIG vs. ARKK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JIG	ARKK
Technology	23.3%	25.9%
Industrials	18.5%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	14.1%
Financial Services	6.9%	16.2%
Basic Materials	3.8%	-
Healthcare	3.2%	28.1%
Communication Services	2.8%	10.0%
Utilities	2.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-
Energy	0.7%	-
Real Estate	0.7%	-

Return for Risk

JIG vs. ARKK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIG

JIG Risk / Return Rank: 42
JIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
JIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
JIG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
JIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
JIG Martin Ratio Rank: 48

ARKK

ARKK Risk / Return Rank: 18
ARKK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
ARKK Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
ARKK Omega Ratio Rank: 19
ARKK Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ARKK Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIG vs. ARKK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JIG	ARKK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	0.63	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	1.09	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.13	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	0.73	+1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.69	1.58	+6.11

JIG vs. ARKK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the ARKK Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIG and ARKK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JIG vs. ARKK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIG drawdown since its inception was -43.75%, smaller than the maximum ARKK drawdown of -80.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIG and ARKK.

Drawdown Indicators

	JIG	ARKK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.75%	-80.97%	+37.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.94%	-31.35%	+18.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.04%	-39.56%	+23.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.75%	-77.23%	+33.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-49.18%	+48.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.68%	-30.18%	+13.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	14.47%	-11.01%

Volatility

JIG vs. ARKK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) is 8.39%, while ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a volatility of 12.24%. This indicates that JIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JIG	ARKK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.39%	12.24%	-3.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.61%	26.67%	-9.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.72%	36.33%	-16.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.21%	46.43%	-27.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.20%	40.39%	-21.19%

JIG vs. ARKK - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

JIG vs. ARKK - Dividend Comparison

JIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, while ARKK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.70%	0.00%	0.55%	1.64%	0.38%	3.14%	1.32%	0.00%	2.27%
JIG JPMorgan International Growth ETF	1.92%	2.25%	1.70%	1.69%	0.91%	1.35%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JIG and ARKK in my portfolio?

JIG and ARKK have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JIG or ARKK?

ARKK has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to JIG (8.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIG dropped -43.75% vs ARKK's -80.97%.

Which ETF is better, JIG or ARKK?

On 5-year performance, JIG leads with 3.80% vs -7.72% for ARKK. On fees, JIG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, JIG has been the lower-risk option at 8.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JIG or ARKK?

Over the 5-year period, JIG has performed better with a 3.80% return vs -7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JIG or ARKK?

JIG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JIG or ARKK?

JIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 0.00% for ARKK.

What is the main difference between JIG and ARKK?

JIG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ARKK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for JIG and 0.75% for ARKK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.