PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIEMX vs. SABTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIEMX vs. SABTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Equity Income Fund (JIEMX) and SA U.S. Value Fund (SABTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIEMX achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly lower than SABTX's 18.33% return. Over the past 10 years, JIEMX has underperformed SABTX with an annualized return of 5.04%, while SABTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.


JIEMX

1D
1.06%
1M
2.08%
YTD
12.85%
6M
-25.87%
1Y
-19.41%
3Y*
0.94%
5Y*
-1.72%
10Y*
5.04%

SABTX

1D
0.66%
1M
4.86%
YTD
18.33%
6M
19.89%
1Y
38.63%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIEMX vs. SABTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIEMX
John Hancock Funds II Equity Income Fund
12.85%-26.66%11.75%9.49%-11.75%25.29%1.07%26.44%-9.78%15.46%
SABTX
SA U.S. Value Fund
18.33%17.69%11.32%11.82%-6.35%27.06%-2.04%24.85%-12.14%18.45%

Correlation

The correlation between JIEMX and SABTX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2005

0.96

The correlation between JIEMX and SABTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIEMX vs. SABTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIEMX
JIEMX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
JIEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
JIEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SABTX
SABTX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SABTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SABTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SABTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SABTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SABTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIEMX vs. SABTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Equity Income Fund (JIEMX) and SA U.S. Value Fund (SABTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIEMXSABTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.66

-0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

6.81

-7.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

24.61

-25.56

JIEMX vs. SABTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIEMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the SABTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIEMX and SABTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIEMXSABTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

3.73

-4.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.68

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.61

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.37

-0.12

Drawdowns

JIEMX vs. SABTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIEMX drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, smaller than the maximum SABTX drawdown of -66.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIEMX and SABTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIEMXSABTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.26%

-66.96%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.12%

-6.36%

-29.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.12%

-16.63%

-19.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.12%

-20.42%

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.76%

-42.00%

+2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.18%

0.00%

-27.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.90%

-11.32%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.64%

1.72%

+19.92%

Volatility

JIEMX vs. SABTX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Equity Income Fund (JIEMX) and SA U.S. Value Fund (SABTX) have volatilities of 2.76% and 2.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIEMXSABTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

2.80%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.66%

8.32%

+35.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.68%

11.63%

+27.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

16.37%

+6.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

19.16%

+2.43%

JIEMX vs. SABTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIEMX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SABTX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIEMX vs. SABTX - Dividend Comparison

JIEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than SABTX's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIEMX
John Hancock Funds II Equity Income Fund
1.21%1.75%11.35%7.98%2.09%9.34%2.59%8.25%13.73%8.43%3.73%11.26%
SABTX
SA U.S. Value Fund
3.28%3.88%2.60%1.67%7.66%4.25%1.52%5.14%9.80%10.36%5.08%6.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, JIEMX and SABTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SABTX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to JIEMX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIEMX dropped -62.26% vs SABTX's -66.96%.

SABTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIEMX and SABTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer