JICDX vs. PCGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund (JICDX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX).
JICDX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 14, 2005. PCGTX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995.
Performance
JICDX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JICDX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JICDX John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund | -0.25% | 5.57% | 1.42% | 5.77% | -13.68% | -2.01% | 8.40% | 8.21% | -0.54% | 3.24% |
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments | 2.45% | 7.84% | 0.98% | 5.12% | -13.48% | -0.61% | 5.75% | 6.55% | 0.17% | 2.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JICDX achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, JICDX has underperformed PCGTX with an annualized return of 1.32%, while PCGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.61% annualized return.
JICDX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.06%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
PCGTX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- 1Y
- 7.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JICDX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JICDX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JICDX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank
JICDX
PCGTX
JICDX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund (JICDX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JICDX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 1.39 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 2.24 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.29 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.45 | -0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 7.00 | -2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JICDX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.39 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.04 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.30 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.97 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between JICDX and PCGTX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JICDX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison
JICDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than PCGTX's 4.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JICDX John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund | 2.79% | 2.85% | 4.25% | 3.66% | 2.34% | 1.74% | 6.47% | 3.38% | 2.69% | 2.03% | 2.44% | 1.72% |
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments | 4.44% | 3.78% | 5.36% | 5.02% | 3.67% | 2.87% | 3.23% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 2.96% | 2.71% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
JICDX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JICDX drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGTX drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JICDX and PCGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JICDX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -19.34% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -3.10% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -19.20% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.94% | -19.34% | +0.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -1.85% | -2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -1.86% | -1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 1.09% | +0.02% |
Volatility
JICDX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund (JICDX) is 1.66%, while PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a volatility of 2.13%. This indicates that JICDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JICDX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 2.13% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.22% | 4.13% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.06% | 6.23% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.11% | 7.10% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 5.35% | -0.37% |