PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBG.L vs. UC98.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBG.L vs. UC98.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JIBG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JIBG.L is traded in GBP, while UC98.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC98.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBG.L achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than UC98.L's -0.99% return.


JIBG.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.64%
6M
0.06%
YTD
0.28%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*

UC98.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.37%
6M
-1.13%
YTD
-0.99%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*
1.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBG.L vs. UC98.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JIBG.L
JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
0.28%0.49%3.97%2.30%-5.70%-0.65%-24.58%
UC98.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
-0.99%0.33%3.62%2.43%-7.46%-1.33%-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBG.L and UC98.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2020

0.97

The correlation between JIBG.L and UC98.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBG.L vs. UC98.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBG.L
JIBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JIBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

UC98.L
UC98.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UC98.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC98.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC98.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
UC98.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC98.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBG.L vs. UC98.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JIBG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIBG.LUC98.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.09

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

0.63

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.60

1.47

+1.12

JIBG.L vs. UC98.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the UC98.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBG.L and UC98.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIBG.L vs. UC98.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.28%, smaller than the maximum UC98.L drawdown of -36.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBG.L and UC98.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBG.LUC98.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.28%

-36.07%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-4.86%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.67%

-8.30%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.77%

-14.17%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.63%

-10.89%

-13.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.37%

-14.40%

-12.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.09%

-0.18%

Volatility

JIBG.L vs. UC98.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JIBG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC98.L) have volatilities of 2.08% and 2.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBG.LUC98.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

2.03%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.49%

4.44%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.06%

6.00%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.95%

8.93%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.95%

9.73%

+3.22%

JIBG.L vs. UC98.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBG.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than UC98.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JIBG.L vs. UC98.L - Dividend Comparison

JIBG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than UC98.L's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIBG.L
JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
5.59%4.93%5.37%4.10%3.94%6.87%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC98.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
4.52%5.96%4.81%3.91%2.35%2.01%2.72%3.27%2.04%1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JIBG.L and UC98.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JIBG.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JIBG.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UC98.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for JIBG.L and 0.20% for UC98.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBG.L and UC98.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer