JHVTX vs. FCEEX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JHVTX (John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Emerging Markets Value Trust) and FCEEX (Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, JHVTX returned 8.72%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for FCEEX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JHVTX charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for FCEEX.

Performance

JHVTX vs. FCEEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Emerging Markets Value Trust (JHVTX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHVTX achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly lower than FCEEX's 30.02% return.

JHVTX

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 18.61%
• 6M: 19.49%
• 1Y: 40.97%
• 3Y*: 16.89%
• 5Y*: 8.72%
• 10Y*: —

FCEEX

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: 6.82%
• YTD: 30.02%
• 6M: 31.93%
• 1Y: 54.98%
• 3Y*: 25.96%
• 5Y*: 10.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHVTX vs. FCEEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JHVTX John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Emerging Markets Value Trust	18.61%	32.01%	-2.45%	15.17%	-11.61%	11.24%	3.70%	10.85%
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	30.02%	34.81%	10.51%	12.52%	-16.96%	-1.29%	10.19%	9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between JHVTX and FCEEX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019	0.86

The correlation between JHVTX and FCEEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JHVTX vs. FCEEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHVTX

JHVTX Risk / Return Rank: 86
JHVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
JHVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
JHVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
JHVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
JHVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FCEEX

FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHVTX vs. FCEEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Emerging Markets Value Trust (JHVTX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JHVTX	FCEEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	2.76	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	3.43	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.51	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.16	4.23	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.40	15.97	-1.57

JHVTX vs. FCEEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHVTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the FCEEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHVTX and FCEEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JHVTX vs. FCEEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHVTX drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, which is greater than FCEEX's maximum drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHVTX and FCEEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHVTX	FCEEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.10%	-34.68%	-13.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.27%	-12.98%	+1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.40%	-15.47%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.25%	-33.39%	+9.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-0.58%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.38%	-11.20%	+0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	3.42%	-0.33%

Volatility

JHVTX vs. FCEEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Emerging Markets Value Trust (JHVTX) is 6.56%, while Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that JHVTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCEEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHVTX	FCEEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.56%	10.46%	-3.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.73%	17.57%	-3.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.54%	19.90%	-3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.09%	17.41%	-2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.32%	18.64%	-2.32%

JHVTX vs. FCEEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHVTX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FCEEX's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHVTX vs. FCEEX - Dividend Comparison

JHVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than FCEEX's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	2.27%	3.29%	4.17%	4.36%	4.08%	3.38%	2.98%	0.40%	0.00%
JHVTX John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Emerging Markets Value Trust	0.97%	1.15%	4.55%	1.56%	4.10%	2.50%	2.16%	3.16%	3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHVTX and FCEEX in my portfolio?

JHVTX and FCEEX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHVTX or FCEEX?

FCEEX has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to JHVTX (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHVTX dropped -48.10% vs FCEEX's -34.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHVTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.