PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHQDX vs. ETB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHQDX vs. ETB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 Fund Class I (JHQDX) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHQDX achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly higher than ETB's 5.02% return.


JHQDX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.64%
YTD
6.05%
6M
6.32%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*

ETB

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.14%
YTD
5.02%
6M
5.90%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
8.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHQDX vs. ETB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JHQDX
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 Fund Class I
6.05%7.56%18.03%15.26%-13.30%14.40%
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
5.02%11.16%26.22%7.50%-16.59%23.48%

Correlation

The correlation between JHQDX and ETB is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2021

0.65

The correlation between JHQDX and ETB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHQDX vs. ETB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHQDX
JHQDX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
JHQDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHQDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHQDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JHQDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHQDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ETB
ETB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ETB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ETB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETB Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHQDX vs. ETB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 Fund Class I (JHQDX) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHQDXETBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.23

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

11.72

+0.13

JHQDX vs. ETB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHQDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the ETB Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHQDX and ETB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHQDXETBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.84

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.47

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.41

+0.59

Drawdowns

JHQDX vs. ETB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHQDX drawdown since its inception was -15.25%, smaller than the maximum ETB drawdown of -51.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHQDX and ETB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHQDXETBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.25%

-51.09%

+35.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.41%

-9.16%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.27%

-20.09%

+10.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.25%

-23.43%

+8.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.71%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-6.72%

+3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.74%

-0.54%

Volatility

JHQDX vs. ETB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 Fund Class I (JHQDX) is 1.06%, while Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that JHQDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHQDXETBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

2.75%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.53%

9.05%

-3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.82%

11.14%

-4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.78%

16.26%

-7.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.66%

18.02%

-9.36%

JHQDX vs. ETB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHQDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ETB's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHQDX vs. ETB - Dividend Comparison

JHQDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than ETB's 8.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETB
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund
8.20%8.31%8.21%8.62%9.63%7.57%8.64%7.90%9.64%7.75%7.85%7.77%
JHQDX
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 Fund Class I
0.47%0.50%0.75%0.96%6.91%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHQDX and ETB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETB has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to JHQDX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHQDX dropped -15.25% vs ETB's -51.09%.

JHQDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHQDX and ETB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer