JHQAX vs. PPFIX
JHQAX (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund) and PPFIX (Princeton Premium Fund) are both Options Trading funds. Over the past 5 years, JHQAX returned 6.73%/yr vs 5.62%/yr for PPFIX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHQAX charges 0.83%/yr vs 1.95%/yr for PPFIX.
Performance
JHQAX vs. PPFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHQAX achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than PPFIX's 1.77% return.
JHQAX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -1.35%
- 1Y
- 6.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.62%
PPFIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- 6.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- —
JHQAX vs. PPFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHQAX JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund | -1.95% | 7.22% | 17.93% | 15.78% | -8.27% | 13.13% | 13.77% | 13.38% | -0.93% | 11.87% |
PPFIX Princeton Premium Fund | 1.77% | 7.45% | 4.29% | 7.54% | 1.84% | 14.93% | 3.32% | 8.75% | -5.38% | 10.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHQAX and PPFIX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHQAX vs. PPFIX — Risk / Return Rank
JHQAX
PPFIX
JHQAX vs. PPFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund (JHQAX) and Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHQAX | PPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -20.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 10.49 | -9.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 25.78 | -24.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | 127.88 | -124.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHQAX | PPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 7.64 | -6.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 1.50 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.80 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
JHQAX vs. PPFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHQAX drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, which is greater than PPFIX's maximum drawdown of -15.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHQAX and PPFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHQAX | PPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -15.64% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.91% | -0.25% | -6.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.11% | -4.49% | -8.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.48% | -4.49% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.21% | 0.00% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -1.35% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 0.05% | +1.94% |
Volatility
JHQAX vs. PPFIX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund (JHQAX) has a higher volatility of 0.49% compared to Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX) at 0.17%. This indicates that JHQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHQAX | PPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 0.17% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.78% | 0.54% | +4.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.31% | 0.84% | +5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.86% | 3.77% | +5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 7.12% | +2.26% |
JHQAX vs. PPFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHQAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than PPFIX's 1.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHQAX vs. PPFIX - Dividend Comparison
JHQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than PPFIX's 5.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHQAX JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.51% | 0.74% | 0.74% | 0.50% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.92% | 0.76% | 1.11% | 0.97% |
PPFIX Princeton Premium Fund | 5.59% | 5.62% | 6.24% | 6.86% | 1.92% | 7.16% | 0.44% | 0.23% | 0.93% | 2.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHQAX and PPFIX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHQAX has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to PPFIX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHQAX dropped -18.82% vs PPFIX's -15.64%.
PPFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.64 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHQAX and PPFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer