JHPI vs. JHMU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Preferred Income ETF (JHPI) and John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU).

JHPI and JHMU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JHPI is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 14, 2021. JHMU is a passively managed fund by John Hancock that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Utilities Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2023.

Performance

JHPI vs. JHMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Preferred Income ETF (JHPI) and John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JHPI vs. JHMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JHPI John Hancock Preferred Income ETF	-0.26%	7.37%	10.54%	7.74%
JHMU John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF	-0.05%	5.03%	3.76%	7.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHPI achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than JHMU's -0.05% return.

JHPI

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -2.03%
• YTD: -0.26%
• 6M: 0.31%
• 1Y: 6.56%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JHMU

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: 1.69%
• 1Y: 4.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHPI vs. JHMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHPI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than JHMU's 0.39% expense ratio.

JHPI

John Hancock Preferred Income ETF

JHMU

John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF

Return for Risk

JHPI vs. JHMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHPI

JHPI Risk / Return Rank: 79
JHPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
JHPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
JHPI Omega Ratio Rank: 84
JHPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
JHPI Martin Ratio Rank: 68

JHMU

JHMU Risk / Return Rank: 58
JHMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
JHMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
JHMU Omega Ratio Rank: 70
JHMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
JHMU Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHPI vs. JHMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Preferred Income ETF (JHPI) and John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHPI	JHMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.17	+0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	1.50	+0.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.26	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	1.31	+0.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.90	4.34	+2.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHPI vs. JHMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the JHMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHPI and JHMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHPI	JHMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	1.17	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	1.66	-1.12

Correlation

The correlation between JHPI and JHMU is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

JHPI vs. JHMU - Dividend Comparison

JHPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than JHMU's 3.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JHPI John Hancock Preferred Income ETF	5.66%	5.73%	6.32%	6.44%	6.27%	0.24%
JHMU John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF	3.86%	4.36%	7.29%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

JHPI vs. JHMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHPI drawdown since its inception was -13.45%, which is greater than JHMU's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHPI and JHMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHPI	JHMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.45%	-4.48%	-8.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.08%	-3.69%	+0.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-2.27%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.87%	-0.81%	-3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.12%	-0.19%

Volatility

JHPI vs. JHMU - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Preferred Income ETF (JHPI) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU) at 1.29%. This indicates that JHPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHPI	JHMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	1.29%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.54%	2.08%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.96%	4.10%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.39%	4.19%	+2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.39%	4.19%	+2.20%