JHNBX vs. JILCX
JHNBX (John Hancock Bond Fund) and JILCX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio) are both mutual funds - JHNBX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by John Hancock, while JILCX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JHNBX returned 2.23%/yr vs 4.44%/yr for JILCX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHNBX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for JILCX.
Performance
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHNBX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than JILCX's 3.19% return. Over the past 10 years, JHNBX has underperformed JILCX with an annualized return of 2.23%, while JILCX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.44% annualized return.
JHNBX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.04%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
JILCX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- 8.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 4.44%
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund | 0.69% | 7.53% | 1.97% | 6.24% | -15.22% | -0.68% | 10.31% | 10.09% | -1.15% | 4.94% |
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | 3.19% | 9.33% | 6.12% | 9.17% | -11.73% | 3.55% | 9.85% | 12.00% | -3.33% | 6.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHNBX and JILCX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2005 | 0.42 |
The correlation between JHNBX and JILCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.69 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHNBX vs. JILCX — Risk / Return Rank
JHNBX
JILCX
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) and John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHNBX | JILCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.44 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 2.92 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 12.79 | -8.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHNBX drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, which is greater than JILCX's maximum drawdown of -22.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHNBX and JILCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHNBX | JILCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.74% | -22.90% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -3.58% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.69% | -5.06% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.13% | -16.51% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.13% | -16.51% | -3.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -0.47% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.14% | -2.50% | -1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 0.75% | +0.38% |
Volatility
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) is 1.29%, while John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that JHNBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JILCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHNBX | JILCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.29% | 1.86% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 3.76% | -0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.98% | 4.66% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.89% | 5.54% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 5.08% | -0.15% |
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHNBX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than JILCX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Dividend Comparison
JHNBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than JILCX's 3.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund | 4.46% | 4.41% | 4.14% | 3.80% | 2.93% | 3.30% | 5.50% | 3.75% | 3.51% | 3.23% | 3.19% | 3.48% |
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | 3.83% | 4.15% | 4.17% | 3.89% | 6.79% | 6.25% | 4.53% | 4.01% | 4.39% | 2.44% | 4.26% | 5.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHNBX and JILCX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JILCX has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to JHNBX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHNBX dropped -24.74% vs JILCX's -22.90%.
JILCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHNBX and JILCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer