JHNBX vs. JILCX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) and John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX).
JHNBX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Nov 9, 1973. JILCX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 13, 2005.
Performance
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund | -0.50% | 7.36% | 1.97% | 6.24% | -15.22% | -0.68% | 10.31% | 10.09% | -1.15% | 4.94% |
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | -0.81% | 9.33% | 6.12% | 9.17% | -11.73% | 3.55% | 9.85% | 12.00% | -3.33% | 6.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHNBX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly higher than JILCX's -0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, JHNBX has underperformed JILCX with an annualized return of 2.28%, while JILCX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.16% annualized return.
JHNBX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
JILCX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 6.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHNBX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than JILCX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JHNBX vs. JILCX — Risk / Return Rank
JHNBX
JILCX
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) and John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHNBX | JILCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.50 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 2.27 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.32 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.55 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | 6.86 | -3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHNBX | JILCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.50 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.53 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.85 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.92 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between JHNBX and JILCX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Dividend Comparison
JHNBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than JILCX's 3.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund | 3.95% | 4.25% | 4.14% | 3.80% | 2.93% | 3.30% | 5.50% | 3.75% | 3.51% | 3.23% | 3.19% | 3.48% |
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | 3.40% | 4.15% | 4.17% | 3.89% | 6.79% | 6.25% | 4.53% | 4.01% | 4.39% | 2.44% | 4.26% | 5.65% |
Drawdowns
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHNBX drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, which is greater than JILCX's maximum drawdown of -22.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHNBX and JILCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHNBX | JILCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.74% | -22.90% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -3.58% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.13% | -16.51% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.13% | -16.51% | -3.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -2.95% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -2.52% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 1.07% | -0.01% |
Volatility
JHNBX vs. JILCX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) has a higher volatility of 1.65% compared to John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) at 1.54%. This indicates that JHNBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JILCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JHNBX | JILCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 1.54% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | 2.93% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45% | 5.54% | -1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.84% | 5.41% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.89% | 5.02% | -0.13% |