JHMU vs. AUSM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

JHMU (John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF) and AUSM (Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. JHMU is passively managed, while AUSM is actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHMU charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AUSM.

Performance

JHMU vs. AUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMU achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than AUSM's 0.98% return.

JHMU

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 6M: 2.23%
• 1Y: 7.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AUSM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 0.98%
• 6M: 1.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMU vs. AUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JHMU John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF	2.14%	4.58%
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF	0.98%	1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMU and AUSM is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

JHMU vs. AUSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMU

JHMU Risk / Return Rank: 77
JHMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
JHMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
JHMU Omega Ratio Rank: 91
JHMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
JHMU Martin Ratio Rank: 58

AUSM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMU vs. AUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JHMU	AUSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.10	—	—

Drawdowns

JHMU vs. AUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMU drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, which is greater than AUSM's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMU and AUSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHMU	AUSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-0.42%	-4.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.23%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-0.09%	-0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JHMU	AUSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.28%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84%	0.78%	+2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.09%	0.78%	+3.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.09%	0.78%	+3.31%

JHMU vs. AUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMU has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSM's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHMU vs. AUSM - Dividend Comparison

JHMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than AUSM's 2.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF	2.39%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%
JHMU John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF	3.71%	4.36%	7.29%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHMU and AUSM in my portfolio?

JHMU and AUSM have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JHMU or AUSM?

On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHMU or AUSM?

AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHMU or AUSM?

JHMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 2.39% for AUSM.

What is the main difference between JHMU and AUSM?

They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMU and 0.18% for AUSM.