JHDV vs. LVDS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

JHDV (John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF) and LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JHDV returned 25.93% vs 27.03% for LVDS. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHDV charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LVDS.

Performance

JHDV vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JHDV having a 18.64% return and LVDS slightly lower at 18.27%.

JHDV

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 16.00%
• YTD: 18.64%
• 1Y: 25.93%
• 3Y*: 20.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LVDS

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.78%
• 6M: 15.06%
• YTD: 18.27%
• 1Y: 27.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHDV vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF	18.64%	6.15%
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	18.27%	7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JHDV and LVDS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.78

Return for Risk

JHDV vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHDV

JHDV Risk / Return Rank: 81
JHDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
JHDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
JHDV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
JHDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
JHDV Martin Ratio Rank: 82

LVDS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHDV vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JHDV	LVDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.69	—	—

Drawdowns

JHDV vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHDV drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHDV and LVDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHDV	LVDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.97%	-6.64%	-12.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.26%	-6.64%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-0.02%	-1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-0.93%	-1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JHDV	LVDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.68%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.21%	10.59%	+1.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.64%	10.59%	+5.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.64%	10.59%	+5.05%

JHDV vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHDV has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHDV vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

JHDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than LVDS's 7.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF	2.05%	2.40%	2.50%	2.77%	0.85%
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	7.61%	8.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHDV and LVDS in my portfolio?

JHDV and LVDS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JHDV or LVDS?

On 1-year performance, LVDS leads with 27.03% vs 25.93% for JHDV. On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHDV or LVDS?

Over the 1-year period, LVDS has performed better with a 27.03% return vs 25.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHDV or LVDS?

LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for JHDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHDV or LVDS?

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.61%, compared with 2.05% for JHDV.

What is the main difference between JHDV and LVDS?

They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for JHDV and 0.30% for LVDS.