PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHDV vs. JHCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHDV vs. JHCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) and John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHDV achieves a 20.00% return, which is significantly higher than JHCR's 0.63% return.


JHDV

1D
0.79%
1M
7.92%
YTD
20.00%
6M
20.97%
1Y
36.17%
3Y*
22.66%
5Y*
10Y*

JHCR

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.65%
1Y
6.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHDV vs. JHCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JHDV
John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
20.00%14.76%0.32%
JHCR
John Hancock Core Bond ETF
0.63%7.54%-0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between JHDV and JHCR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHDV vs. JHCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHDV
JHDV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
JHDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JHDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

JHCR
JHCR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JHCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCR Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHDV vs. JHCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) and John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHDVJHCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.10

1.44

+1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.18

2.19

+1.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.26

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.43

2.04

+2.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.62

6.27

+12.34

JHDV vs. JHCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHDV Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the JHCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHDV and JHCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHDVJHCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

1.44

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

1.16

+0.23

Drawdowns

JHDV vs. JHCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHDV drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, which is greater than JHCR's maximum drawdown of -2.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHDV and JHCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHDVJHCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-2.85%

-16.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-2.84%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.32%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-0.76%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

0.93%

+1.04%

Volatility

JHDV vs. JHCR - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) at 1.54%. This indicates that JHDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHDVJHCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

1.54%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

3.13%

+5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

4.19%

+7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

4.69%

+11.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

4.69%

+11.00%

JHDV vs. JHCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHDV has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than JHCR's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHDV vs. JHCR - Dividend Comparison

JHDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than JHCR's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JHCR
John Hancock Core Bond ETF
4.23%4.65%0.20%0.00%0.00%
JHDV
John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
1.97%2.40%2.50%2.77%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHDV and JHCR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHDV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to JHCR (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHDV dropped -18.97% vs JHCR's -2.85%.

On 1-year performance, JHDV leads with 36.17% vs 6.02% for JHCR. On fees, JHCR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHCR has been the lower-risk option at 1.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JHDV has performed better with a 36.17% return vs 6.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHCR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for JHDV.

JHCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 1.97% for JHDV.

JHDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while JHCR is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for JHDV and 0.29% for JHCR.

JHDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHDV and JHCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer